How is Matthew 18: 8-9 explained in the context of non works-based salvation?
score:8
Note that this doesn't apply to all groups that adhere to Sola Fide. Plenty of groups believe that we have no part in our own salvation, even in choosing to believe, but this is one perspective that's relatively common among Evangelicals.
Short version:
These verses are simply Jesus teaching on the true definition of what God's standard for "good" is.
Longer version:
These verses are very similar to those in Matthew 5, where Jesus explains that lust is the same as adultery, hatred the same as murder, etc. Jesus was dealing with the Jewish people, who were under the impression that their obedience to the Law would save them. By teaching them the Truth of just how high God's perfect standard is, He was preparing them to understand that they are not truly "good" at all.
Any reasonable person would hear those words and think "there's no way I can be that good and perfect. I'm doomed". To those that hold this view, that's the necessary realization of one's sinful nature that's necessary to drive us to repentance.
An example of one such ministry that holds this view would be Living Waters/The Way of the Master, headed by Ray comfort and Kirk Cameron. Example: Am I good enough to go to Heaven?
Expanding a bit on the necessity of realizing our sinful nature to drive us to repentance, Ray Comfort says this in his Hell's best kept Secret teaching... (This is a paraphrase from memory, but it's close)
You try to save a man from drowning when he doesn't think he is. Jump in, pull him to the shore without telling him anything, he's not going to be too happy with you. But if he sees that he is drowning, he will be grateful, and won't despise the gift.
These verses show that God's standard is perfect, and that we fall short. This is perfectly in harmony with the idea of salvation by faith alone apart from works. God's Law can't save us. it can only show us ourselves in our true nature, so that we can see the need to be saved.
From Bible Study Planet:
Once a person has understood the Law, and its spiritual meaning and content, he knows that can’t keep it. What’s the summary of the Law? It is: “You shall love the Lord thy God with all your heart, and all your soul, and all your mind, and all your strength; and you shall love you neighbor as yourself.” (Luke 10:27)
Paul also wrote of this extensively in the Book of Romans. Two small excerpts:
Now we know that whatever the law says, it says to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be silenced and the whole world held accountable to God. Therefore no one will be declared righteous in his sight by observing the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of sin. (Romans 3:19-20)
...
What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? May it never be! On the contrary, I would not have come to know sin except through the Law; for I would not have known about coveting if the Law had not said, "YOU SHALL NOT COVET." (Romans 7:7)
Upvote:5
The gospel never promises anyone with fake faith salvation. Rather it uses both encouragements and warnings as a means to preserve all the elect into everlasting eternity.
This sort of question can be asked from many verses in the Bible because it rests upon a sometimes-unconscious assumption that ‘God would never warn someone of something, that according to his foreknowledge would never happen.’ This is simply not true. One reason why God knows that something will never happen is because he effectively ensures it does not – partly through his warning that it could.
So the basic meaning of this verse, using bold imagery, is a sin like adultery, for example, should be despised at the utmost. Extending this imagery to its furthers extent, in principle if it came between having our eye, verses having women, we should depart with our eyes happily! In a less symbolic way, if we have the choice of sin and the world, or Christ and our own death, the principle of wisdom and spiritual survival would be to choose Christ. This is the beginning of the gospel. Which goes ‘repent and believe’.
The gospel goes further, ‘repent and believe the good news’! One of the most precious things a sinner will not give up is his own righteousness. In fact this may be the most common idol men will not let go. Extending this sermon further to rank unbelief and self-righteousness we can easily extend the application by saying: ‘If a man prefers self-righteousness to God’s free gift, then he is like a man that refuses to cut away his valued possession (eye). For that he can be certain that he will spend eternity in hell as a just reward for rejecting the gospel. This is not a subject for playing eternal games with God and our own soul!
More post
- 📝 Where can I find a complete set of Ante-Nicene Writings?
- 📝 How can Heaven exist if we know that people in Hell will suffer?
- 📝 When did the concept of οὐσία begin to refer to God's nature?
- 📝 Are we born sinners?
- 📝 Is there a registry of Book of Mormon Geography Theories?
- 📝 Why does God command the Israelites not to boil a goat in its mother's milk?
- 📝 Why does the NIV have 16 verses missing from the Bible?
- 📝 Why do JW think other faiths are unbelievers?
- 📝 According to Catholics & Protestants, do good people from other religions go to heaven as well? If they do, what's the point in being a Christian?
- 📝 Can a nation be under the control of a demon?
- 📝 What did Protestant reformers think about the date and authorship of the New Testament?
- 📝 Reference request about St. John Vianney and the Miraculous Medal?
- 📝 Was "eye for an eye" law in the O.T. imperative or only permissive?
- 📝 What role did the Donation of Constantine have on the development of the doctrine of Papal supremacy?
- 📝 Laurentian Litany - How pray it?
- 📝 What were the advantages of a monarchy system that Israel wanted?
- 📝 How did the Apostolic Church manage to integrate different Tribes and Clans under its ambit?
- 📝 What are the steps and permissions required to add more "patronages" to saints?
- 📝 From a Catholic perspective, what do family relationships look like in heaven?
- 📝 Does transubstantiation teach that the Son regularly returns physically?
- 📝 Heaven/Paradise/Sheol, Hell/Hades/The Lake of Fire
- 📝 What is the difference between the Life that Christ gives and the Life that Wisdom brings?
- 📝 What is the Biblical Basis for monothelitism?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for venial and mortal sins?
- 📝 If you have a strong desire, is it a given that it's ultimately from God?
- 📝 What are the rules of Exorcism (Catholic Perspective)
- 📝 What is a Catechism and when and how did they originate
- 📝 What is the scientific effectiveness of "street preaching" as a method of evangelization?
- 📝 How do Catholics reconcile these verses about giving publicly and yet privately?
- 📝 What are the protestant arguments against a sacramental economy?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 How is Matthew 18: 8-9 explained in the context of non works-based salvation?
- 📝 How do those who believe in a works or works + faith based salvation interpret Jesus' words to the criminal in Luke 23:43?
- 📝 How does Matthew 25:31-46 ("The Sheep and the Goats") reconcile with salvation by faith?
- 📝 How do those who believe in salvation by grace, and in works being the fruit of salvation, explain Galatians 6:8-9?
- 📝 How do the proponents of the doctrine that salvation can't be lost usually explain Matthew 7:21-23?
- 📝 How does the Catholic church explain Matthew 19:9, which seems to allow divorce in case of sexual misconduct?
- 📝 How does the Arminian view of salvation account for God's sovereignty?
- 📝 How do the proponents of the idea that salvation once received cannot be lost explain Hebrews 6:4-6 and 10:26-29?
- 📝 How is the view of guaranteed salvation for infants justified?
- 📝 On the topic of marriage in heaven, how does the LDS church reconcile Matthew 22:23-33?
- 📝 How is Matthew 24:36 explained by trinitarians?
- 📝 How does 1 John 2:19 fit with the teaching that Christians can lose their salvation
- 📝 How do proponents of the Prosperity Gospel interpret Matthew 6:19-21 and Luke 6:20-26?
- 📝 How is the amazement of the Jews explained by those who believe that "Render Unto Caesar" affirmed the paying of taxes?
- 📝 How do proponents of the Prosperity Gospel interpret Matthew 19:24?
- 📝 How do non-universalists account for these passages talking about the salvation of all?
- 📝 How is 1 Corinthians 9:27 reconciled with the teaching that losing salvation is impossible?
- 📝 How is the situation of "divorce her quietly" in Matthew 1:19 according to Catholicism?
- 📝 How is the divinity of Jesus defended in light of Philippians 2:9 ("God exalted him") and Matthew 28:18?
- 📝 How are the teachings in the Book of James consistent with Salvation by Grace alone?
- 📝 How do the LDS interpret Matthew 19:12?
- 📝 How do Latter-day Saints respond to the claim that the Book of Mormon is based on "Manuscript Found" by Solomon Spaulding? (aka the Spaulding Theory)
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church interpret Matthew 23:9 so as to normalize priests being called Father?
- 📝 If God desires salvation for all, how come many people died without hearing the gospel?
- 📝 How do Evangelicals understand "holy children" in 1 Cor 7:14, with respect to the salvation of children dying in infancy?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church respond to the claim that its authority to interpret scripture is based on circular reasoning?
- 📝 How are the bread and wine explained by those who forbid images of Jesus?
- 📝 How do believers in the Great Apostasy reconcile their views with Matthew 16:18?
- 📝 How do Swedenborgians understand Jesus' words on marriage in the resurrection in Matthew 22:30?
- 📝 Has the matter of salvation - whether it is by works or by faith alone - ever been considered on any councils of the Catholic and Orthodox churches?
