How does the Catholic Church respond to the claim that its authority to interpret scripture is based on circular reasoning?
Upvote:1
It's not circular reasoning, it's spiral reasoning.
We start with the bible as if it were just any other historical document and interpret it as such. Doing so, we discover that Jesus founded a church and invested it with his Divine authority. We see that in Peter he established a Papacy to lead this church. Using this information we search for the modern day church which has the successor to the Papacy. We identify the Roman Catholic Church as this church and conclude that it is the church that Jesus founded, complete with his Divine authority to teach. We then examine the teachings of this church. One of these teachings is that God speaks through the bible. All of a sudden the Bible becomes more than just a historical document...
The papacy is key. Peter was the visible focal point of unity for the early church, and the Popes, as his successors, succeed him in this role. Therefore whichever church has the true papacy is the true church of Christ. We can establish all this merely by reading the scriptures as historical documents. We don't need to depend on them as if they are word of God, that comes later. In this way it is "Spiral" reasoning rather than "Circular" reasoning.
Upvote:3
The teaching of both Roman and Eastern traditions is that the Bible can only be understood in the context of culture and traditions which birthed it.
The reader must take into account the conditions of their time and culture, the literary genres in use at that time, and the modes of feeling, speaking and narrating then current. "For the fact is that truth is differently presented and expressed in the various types of historical writing, in prophetical and poetical texts, and in other forms of literary expression. (CCC 110)
Understanding Paul but ignoring those who knew him (like Ignatius, Polycarp, or the contents of the Didache) would be like studying Luther but claiming anyone who knew him was a quack. All of those documents testify to a church with a defined set of bishops, given the authority to rule over and teach the Church (strikingly similar to the Episcopai Paul talks about in the New Testament).
The Church claims itself to be "the pillar and foundation of truth" (CCC 171 citing 1 Tim. 3:15). The Roman Catholic Church cites 1 Timothy as an example for people who view the Bible as authoritative (note: the Bible does NOT claim that title), but the Church would be the pillar and foundation even if Paul had never said that. In fact, there is a very, very long list authors, going back to the very beginning of Christianity who testify to the Church.
All of that said, you can still find testimony of the authority of the Church and the validity of her practices in scripture, but that is a different from saying "we interpret the Bible to endorse us therefore it endorses us".
As a counter argument, you might reply: The Bible speaks of deacons, presbyters, and episcopai. These were men selected and ordained by the Apostles for the purposes of administration and evangelization. These early authors claim to be or to know deacons, presbyters, and episcopai. They claim to have served under the Apostles. (we'll ignore the fact that presbyter came into English as "priest", and episcopai came into English as "bishop"). Their instruction and testimony is a valid source of instruction in matters of faith.
More post
- 📝 Is the nature of God the father like that of Abraham the father of Isaac?
- 📝 How is one supposed to "know" whether or not the Book of Mormon is true?
- 📝 How was circumcision practiced in Jesus' time?
- 📝 What is the source of this quote from Augustine about thanking heretics?
- 📝 Can a priest validly celebrate a mass without anybody else present?
- 📝 What is the Biblical argument against Limited Atonement?
- 📝 Where did the concept of separate races originate?
- 📝 From the perspective of Catholicism, are there or have there been any Protestant saints?
- 📝 What do the paragraph markings in the Jubilee Bible 2000 translation mean?
- 📝 Origin of the (mis)translation "Ten Commandments"
- 📝 Is the seal of the living God in Revelation 7:1-3 the same as the seal Paul wrote about (Eph 1:13; Eph 4:30; 2 Cor 1:22; cf. 1 John 4:13)?
- 📝 What is the difference between special revelation and (biblical) inspiration?
- 📝 What should I tell my children about Santa?
- 📝 Why do Mormon missionaries travel in pairs?
- 📝 Was Jesus opposed to h*m*sexual activity?
- 📝 Early Christian Lent Fasting Practices
- 📝 Is the register where the first marriage was registered still available?
- 📝 Is there more than one High Priest in the order of Melchizedek?
- 📝 Why is baptism by the Holy Spirit called a "baptism"?
- 📝 What is the SBC's stance on what/how salvation is/works?
- 📝 Who first explicitly understood "works of the law" in Galatians 3:10 as referring to only the ritual law, and not the Mosaic law generally?
- 📝 Meaning of end of chapter 3 of the 2nd Helvetic Confession
- 📝 Do lay Catholics have any recourse to override the plans of a diocesan Ordinary?
- 📝 Is there any evidence in the Roman catacombs that the Early Church had a devotion to the Virgin Mary?
- 📝 Can people speak in tongues today?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church visualize Jesus breathing over His disciples post-resurrecion?
- 📝 Is punishment for sins forgiven by baptism? (Catholic perspective)
- 📝 Can Catholics receive a canonically valid marriage after civil elopement?
- 📝 Are Calvinism and Arminianism compatible?
- 📝 Do we know the fates of any of the implausible relics Martin Luther described?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church respond to the claim that its authority to interpret scripture is based on circular reasoning?
- 📝 Does the Catholic Church teach that it has the authority to change what is morally right and wrong?
- 📝 Does the Catholic Church officially claim that the Bible is insufficient without tradition?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church interpret Matthew 23:9 so as to normalize priests being called Father?
- 📝 How does the Roman Catholic Church interpret predestination?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church explain passages that seem to use culturally specific logic?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church interpret Galatians 2:7?
- 📝 How does Catholic Church differentiate between the presence of Jesus and that of the Holy Spirit on the earth?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church explain their belief that Jesus chose Peter to build upon?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church interpret "you are gods" in John 10:34?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church reconcile its doctrine of a divine plan with the disorder and randomness of life?
- 📝 How does the Catholic church explain Matthew 19:9, which seems to allow divorce in case of sexual misconduct?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church reconcile evolution with original sin?
- 📝 Is there any evidence for the claim that the Catholic church suppressed translation of Scripture?
- 📝 Where does the Catholic church procure most of its Bibles?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church understand the priesthood of all believers?
- 📝 How does the Catholic church view Freemasons?
- 📝 On what basis does the Catholic Church teach that women cannot be ordained?
- 📝 How does the relationship of the Church of Scotland to the state differ from that of the Church of England?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church identify and collect relics?
- 📝 What evidence does the LDS church forward for the claim that the Garden of Eden was in Missouri?
- 📝 Does the Catholic Church teach that Jesus' Human Nature was created?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church choose the patron saint of a parish church?
- 📝 Does the Catholic Church have a contingency plan for the case that the pope and all cardinals are dead?
- 📝 How do Latter-day Saints respond to the claim that the Book of Mormon is based on "Manuscript Found" by Solomon Spaulding? (aka the Spaulding Theory)
- 📝 How does the LDS Church handle verses that imply there is no one like God?
- 📝 Does the Catholic Church teach that some who died before Christ are still in Limbo? Why?
- 📝 How is the claim that the doctrine of Papal Infallibility has always existed within the Church substantiated?
- 📝 How do proponents of the 'Critical Text' respond to the claim that it preserves an anti-Trinitarian corruption dating from the fifth century?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church view Penal Substitutionary Atonement?
