How does 1 John 2:19 fit with the teaching that Christians can lose their salvation
score:6
I think we're reading our cultural bias back into this text - namely by saying that it is talking about salvation in terms of "in" or "out" and our soteriological context. That is a very Western concept, and was largely foreign to the apostles. For them, salvation was found only in the Church (referring here to the gathered and 'sent' people of God, not to a building nor an institution), and to leave the Church was to leave Christ. Granted, this has soteriological implications, but only as a consequence of leaving the Church and remaining outside of Her.
As you stated, the context of this passage is indeed that the αντιχριστοι (antichrists) were teaching false doctrine, and they "went out" from the κοινωνια (fellowship, participatory community, mentioned in 1:3). The verb μεμενηκεισαν implies that they did not remain, abide, reside, continue, stay, endure, and/or were no longer present. We don't have a great English term to effectively translate this concept, so you often see it in all of the above forms (and some others as well). μεμενηκεισαν is in pluperfect active indicative (3rd person plural) here, simply implying that their present absence is a "state or condition following a completed action in the past," i.e. they (voluntarily) went out and so they no longer remain.
The apostle's view was that we come to the Church and we remain in the Church because the Church is the Body of Christ, and to be one with Him is to be united to the Church, which is His Body (1 Corinthians 12:27; Romans 12:4). Thus there is no salvation outside the Church because there is no salvation apart from union with Christ's Body (which is the Church). This is very sacramental (mysterious) and involves how we are "partakers of the divine nature" (2 Peter 1:4). Trying to understand this passage within the worldview of Western Christian philosophy compartmentalizes salvation as a divine singular action that can occur outside of the Church if someone confesses Jesus as Lord and believes several historical facts about Jesus, or simply prays a special prayer. James reminds us that even the demons believe correct doctrine about God (James 2:19) and that "faith apart from works is dead" (2:26).
So to clearly answer the question, this passage has little to do with the doctrines of conditional or unconditional security. The meaning is simply that these false teachers left the Church (the apostolic fellowship), and by doing so proved that they also left Christ; for to be one with Him is to be united to the Church, which is His Body.
As a further note, the theological implications of this passage have more to say about the concept of apostolic succession than they do about Western soteriology. The real question it should cause us to ask is whether or not we are part of the Church that has remained faithful to the teachings of the apostles.
Upvote:1
Your question seems to imply that the group in this verse includes all people who become Christians and then leave the faith.
However, as @Gilbert Le Blanc pointed out, by giving context to the verse, the thought is referring to a specific group who were not believers. So the verse does not refer to everyone who ceases to call themselves Christian.
Upvote:1
I would say that this passage, given the context, is referring to the body of Christ when John says "us". That would indicate eternal security of your salvation. However, if one wanted to interpret the passage to say that by "us", John is referring to a particular group of people (a group of teachers, a particular assembly of believers, etc.), then in that sense it wouldn't contradict with the conditional security belief.
However, I don't think that makes sense, because if John was referring to particular group of people, then he wouldn't say "for if they had been of us, they would have remained with us...", because you can be part of any group and then decide to not be part of it, any group but the body of Christ. If you are truly Christ's, then you can never be separated from Him:
For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Romans 8:38-39 (KJV)
Upvote:2
This article gives an argument for an alternate interpretation of the passage that does not conflict with conditional security. The author states that:
Clearly then 1 John 2:19 is speaking of these gnostic teachers who went out from the apostles claiming to be super apostles and above the apostles. However, they did not continue in the doctrine of the apostles as the early Church had always done (Acts 2:42). This clearly reveals, writes John, that they were not of the apostles (v.19).
As far as I can understand, under the alternate interpretation a paraphrased interpretation of the passage would be something like:
They went out from [the apostles], but they were not really [apostles]; for if they had been [apostles], they would have remained [apostles]; but they went out, so that it would be shown that they all are not [really apostles].
So the argument is that this passage is referring to a special case - referring only to apostolic imposters. It is argued that apostles always "continue in the doctrine of the apostles". Therefore, the apostle imposters were shown as not really apostles by their "going out".
Upvote:3
John's thought in his letter includes verses 18 and 20. Here's 1 John 2:18-20 (NRSV)
Children, it is the last hour! As you have heard that antichrist is coming, so now many antichrists have come. From this we know that it is the last hour. They went out from us, but they did not belong to us; for if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us. But by going out they made it plain that none of them belongs to us. But you have been anointed by the Holy One, and all of you have knowledge.
John describes for the first time in his letter the departure of the opponents. They went out from the congregation or Christian community he is now writing to. Their departure shows that all of them never really belonged in the first place. As to whether or not these opponents are antichrists, W. Hall Harris III writes:
Now the opponents have withdrawn from the community in a dispute over christological doctrine, a dispute which has every indication of being a bitter split. As Schnackenburg observed, these opponents were secessionists – they left of their own free will; there is no indication in the text that the author’s community took the initiative in expelling them. Houlden noted that this division appears to be a new development within the New Testament.
In what is probably more than coincidence, the same verb used to describe the departure of the opponents here (ejxh'lqan, exhlqan) was used in John 13:30 of the departure of Judas Iscariot from the upper room. The implication is clear – just as Judas betrayed Jesus, so the secessionists have betrayed their fellow members of the community (and indeed, the author himself) and have gone out into the darkness (as Judas went out into the night).
I believe John is describing antichrists in verse 19, that is, people that have decided to work against the community of believers. I don't believe these were people that just lost faith, or had a disagreement about how to observe the Lord's supper.
Edited to add: In the Wikipedia article on Conditional preservation of the saints, 1 John 2:19 is not mentioned as a supporting verse for conditional security. The verse is referring to antichrists, not people that lose their relationship with Christ.
More post
- 📝 Who is the Spirit hearing from in John 16:13?
- 📝 Did J. Gresham Machen consider joining an existing presbyterian body before founding the OPC?
- 📝 Do modern descendants of the Levites need to be ordained with the Aaronic Priesthhood?
- 📝 Why was Descartes' interpretation of the Catholic transubstantiation not approved by Church and how can it be improved?
- 📝 How do believers in present-day miraculous healings respond to skeptics requesting thorough scientific medical documentation accessible worldwide?
- 📝 Why are the books of Matthew and Mark almost identically written?
- 📝 Why has "Devil's advocate" office been changed?
- 📝 What are the differences between the ELCA and UCC?
- 📝 Why is the line from Seth to Noah often called righteous?
- 📝 How do Catholics reconcile these verses about giving publicly and yet privately?
- 📝 According to the Catholic Church, does God punish sinners?
- 📝 Do any Protestants teach that everyone really knows God according to Romans 1:21?
- 📝 What is a Miracle and does it require Faith?
- 📝 What is the Adventist response to Justin Martyr?
- 📝 How did Elijah know he was going to be taken up to heaven?
- 📝 Mormonism or LDS?
- 📝 What is the Difference between a Heretic and a Schismatic, according Catholic and Orthodox tradition?
- 📝 How do Trinitarians reconcile Jesus is a spirit?
- 📝 Did the 12 disciples represent all 12 tribes?
- 📝 At what point did Judaism and Christianity diverge?
- 📝 How to pray for a corrupt government involved in drug trafficking?
- 📝 How do Jehovah's Witnesses understand Hebrews 1?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis that Satan is/was an angel?
- 📝 Why did "Lift Every Voice and Sing" become the "Black National Anthem"?
- 📝 How many Wis*m*n were there?
- 📝 Will there be a second chance for salvation after the Rapture?
- 📝 When and why were stained glass windows first incorporated into the design of a Christian place of worship?
- 📝 What is the Protestant belief known as "faith alone"?
- 📝 What is the LDS position on changing doctrine
- 📝 Why is blasphemy against the Son or Father forgiven but blasphemy against the Spirit isn't forgiven?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 How does 1 John 2:19 fit with the teaching that Christians can lose their salvation
- 📝 Does Augustine ever say that Christians in his time identify their Deus [God] with the Roman deity Saturn?
- 📝 How do Jehovah’s Witnesses support their belief that only 144,000 persons can be in the New Covenant and go to heaven, there to rule with Christ Jesus
- 📝 How do Christians who subscribe to the "religion vs. relationship" dichotomy make sure that their own relationship with God is genuine?
- 📝 How do traditional Christians defend the teaching that Paul is an authentic apostle?
- 📝 How does free will fit with the doctrine of predestination?
- 📝 How do Christians who reject pre-fall death reconcile their views with the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event (66 million years ago)?
- 📝 How do apologists defend against Bart Ehrman's arguments that Church scribes corrected and changed the Bible to fit their theology?
- 📝 Why does LDS teaching say that the Priesthood returned to earth if John never left?
- 📝 How do Jehovah's Witnesses explain John 8:58-59 in a way that accords with their doctrine?
- 📝 When did the teaching that salvation can still be obtained by people after their physical death first appear in Christianity?
- 📝 How is 1 Corinthians 9:27 reconciled with the teaching that losing salvation is impossible?
- 📝 How do evangelical universalists reconcile their position with the designation for Judas that it would be better if he had never been born?
- 📝 How does the doctrine of British Baptists compare with their American cousins?
- 📝 How can Luke 9:49–50 be reconciled with the idea that Christ is the only way?
- 📝 John 1:18 - "No one has ever seen God" - How do Trinitarians reconcile this scripture with the belief that the Lord Jesus Christ is God?
- 📝 How does this fit in with "we are incapable of following the law"?
- 📝 How do Christians reconcile Deuteronomy 13:1-4 with their belief in the abrogation of the Mosaic law?
- 📝 Are there any groups of Christians who believe that all loans made with their money should be made without the expectation of repayment?
- 📝 How does the existence of the Tomb of the Blessed Virgin Mary fit with the Assumption of Mary?
- 📝 How do the Jehovah's witnesses reconcile Isaiah 44:24 with their belief that Jesus is the only direct creation of God?
- 📝 How does one reconcile the idea that physical disability is the result of sin with Exodus 4:11?
- 📝 How does praying the rosary becomes a spiritual sword that can slay the dragon?
- 📝 From a non-Trinitarian perspective, how would you show that the Bible does not teach that the Son is equal with the Father?
- 📝 How do Catholics and other Christians respond to the US Bishops' teaching that Matthew was not written by it supposed author?
- 📝 How does John Owen account for scriptures which state that justification by faith is not through the law?
- 📝 How can the translators of the New World Translation say that their version is near what was originally written?
- 📝 If "God is spirit" then how can the incarnation be possible? How does Nicene theology interpret John 4:24?
- 📝 How do Christians who believe that salvation can be lost interpret John 6:37-44 and John 10:11-30?
- 📝 How do Christians that believe in creatio ex nihilo answer the question of why human beings are not created with a perfect character from the outset?
