Why was Esther not sinning when she broke the law and approached the king?
Upvote:-2
I don't think Esther was disobeying the law at all.
For instance, the law could be written like this:
"Anyone is allowed to come into the King's presence without his permission, but if the king doesn't approve of your coming you will be killed."
Esther took her chance with this law and survived. But even if she had not been approved of by the king, it still would not have been actually disobeying the king, (and certainly no sin). As such, I cannot see this in any way a violation of Romans 13.
Upvote:0
The first question to address is this: What is the nature of Mordecai's ministry? He does not begin his words to Esther with a formula like, "The word of the Lord came to me..." But in his actions - refusing to abandon his sackcloth and pronouncing judgment on Esther's house if she refuses to act - he behaves like a prophet. If we take him to be prophesying, then Esther must visit the King as it is a direct command from God.
If Mordecai is not a prophet with a command from the Lord, we have Galatians 5:22-23 (https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Galatians+5&version=NIV)
But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness,
goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law.
The plot to commit genocide was a brutal evil, and there is no valid law to prevent a person from opposing evil and doing good.
A final point is that Esther asks Mordecai and her other friends to pray and fast for her. During that time the Lord has the opportunity to tell her what to do, whether to seek an audience with the King or follow another path. She eagerly seeks another way and only risks her life when no alternative is given to her. This demonstrates her faithfulness, patience, humility, self control, and courage. With so many tokens of the Holy Spirit at work in her, it is evident that her actions are approved by God.
Upvote:1
Esther 4:11 (ESV) (emphasis mine)
11 [Esther said to Mordecai through her servant] “All the king's servants and the people of the king's provinces know that if any man or woman goes to the king inside the inner court without being called, there is but one law—to be put to death, except the one to whom the king holds out the golden scepter so that he may live. But as for me, I have not been called to come in to the king these thirty days.”
12 And they told Mordecai what Esther had said. 13 Then Mordecai told them to reply to Esther, “Do not think to yourself that in the king's palace you will escape any more than all the other Jews. 14 For if you keep silent at this time, relief and deliverance will rise for the Jews from another place, but you and your father's house will perish. And who knows whether you have not come to the kingdom for such a time as this?”
- The King's Visitation Law: no one can come to the kings inner court without invitation
- The king hasn't called Esther for thirty days to his inner court
- Mordecai reprimanded her for being silent of the issue of far greater importance - the impeding Jewish genocide.
- Mordecai made her realize that her position as the queen can serve as a leverage to influence the king, and in effect, avert the genocide
Now, you might say that they can wait for the time for the king to call her as to not break the king's visitation law. Yet, you may also think that by visiting the king, Esther trust God that she'll find favor.
Furthermore, If both conditions were to happen - Esther visiting the king AND the king reaching out his scepter - she does not technically violate the visitation law. Even if the king did not reach out his scepter, going to the king to plead for her people is better than remaining silent about it.
Esther decided by faith to visit the king, hoping that God will ensure that the she'll find favor in the king's sight.
BTW, you may reference Mark 2:23-28 and 1 Samuel 21 (ESV) for the background, interesting.
Upvote:1
The Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath. Mark 2:27
AKA desperate times call for desperate measures.
David ... when he and those who were with him were hungry ... entered the house of God, and they ate the sacred bread, which is not lawful for him or for those with him to eat, but only for the priests Matthew 12:3
Worrying about breaking a law about entering the palace when the whole lot of them was about to perish seems like a moot point.
It wouldn't be sin because actions are sins depending on the context. If it had been any other time and she broke this law because of disregard for it, it might be sin. But in this context it is not.
Stop judging according to outward appearances; rather judge according to righteous judgement. John 7:24
Upvote:5
A few verses earlier, Esther states the law as such,”…any man or woman who approaches the king in the inner court without being summoned the king has but one law: that they be put to death unless the king extends the gold scepter to them and spares their lives.” Under these circumstances, it is no stretch to say that the king, who had ultimate authority, is the judge who determines whether or not the law has been broken and punishment is meted out. If the king had decided that she was guilty, she would have paid the penalty instantly. On the other hand, if he extends the scepter (as he did) he is saying, “I accept her presence, the law is not compromised.”
There have been many instances where man has taken measures into his own hands to accomplish God’s work. This was not at God’s prompting. Mordecai’s admonition to Esther can be construed as God’s prompting and God, in keeping with his character (which He always does), would never instruct someone to sin.
I don’t know if this satisfies your question, but the way I see it we have a reasonable explanation backed up by an immutable fact.
One might also posit that we are instructed to do right or, perhaps more appropriately, Right, as in right according to God, not the local Constabulary, “Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended. 4 For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason.”) Rom 13:3, 4. A secular comparison might be federal law can trump local law.
More post
- 📝 What is the Catholic Church's position on the relationship between science and religion?
- 📝 What is the meaning of CCC-135?
- 📝 If Catholics have to be open to new life how can they practice Natural Family Planning?
- 📝 Is the practice of seeking the intercession of Rachel admonished in the New Testament?
- 📝 What is the basis for saying rock music is sinful?
- 📝 How is 2 Thessalonians 1:9 understood by those who believe that Hell is eternal conscious torment?
- 📝 What did Jonathan Edwards have to say about the fact that he owned slaves?
- 📝 Why should we pray if God knows everything?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for modern-day prophets?
- 📝 Why does Jesus speak of himself in the third person?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for saying Christians are "friends of God"?
- 📝 Do Catholics have to request a religious exception for matters of conscience from their parish priest?
- 📝 Which prophecies are fulfilled outside of Scripture?
- 📝 What is the source of the belief that the deceased become angels?
- 📝 Do the church fathers ever include quotes of Jesus that aren't from the Bible?
- 📝 Are any written instructions to deal with accidental spilling of the Blessed Sacrament of Blood of Christ on the Altar or aisle?
- 📝 According to the Catholic Church, who taught Moses the Law?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis that prayer is sufficient as a way to recognize truth?
- 📝 Has the Catholic Church changed which sins incur excommunication?
- 📝 How do Lutherans interpret Matthew 15:11?
- 📝 Proverbs 14:4 - What does this mean?
- 📝 Did John the Evangelist make a mistake in counting the post-resurrection apparitions of Jesus?
- 📝 By what process did the miraculous conception of Jesus occur?
- 📝 Will family members get to visit each other if separated into different kingdoms in heaven?
- 📝 Is there any evidence of the crucifixion of Jesus outside of the bible?
- 📝 With whom did Cain and Abel marry?
- 📝 What happened to the tribe of Dan in Revelation?
- 📝 Can Southern Baptists take communion at home alone?
- 📝 Is the use of rosary by Catholics a pagan practice?
- 📝 Why or where were the 1000s of people who knew Jesus, why didn't they help
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Why was Esther not sinning when she broke the law and approached the king?
- 📝 According to those holding that Lazarus was literally raised from the dead, why did Matthew, Mark, and Luke not mention it?
- 📝 How could Jesus be born during the reign of Herod, and when Quirinius was governor of Syria, if those periods were not contemporary?
- 📝 Why was Jesus not welcomed and carefully tested by the Jews if they were (and are) actually waiting for Messiah?
- 📝 If the one born in Bethlehem was ‘a creature’ (as says Arius) and yet did not sin, then why was the first humanity (Adam) not so created?
- 📝 Is there an explanation in Catholicism as to why it was the Son and not the others of the Blessed Trinity to become man and be crucified for our sake?
- 📝 Why was Descartes' interpretation of the Catholic transubstantiation not approved by Church and how can it be improved?
- 📝 Why does the Salvation Army not administer the sacraments of baptism and the Lord's Supper?
- 📝 When did the split in crufix/empty-cross sybolism occur and why did it happen?
- 📝 When was the New Testament divided into sentences and paragraphs?
- 📝 Why Do Moses' Laws About Slavery and Punishment Not Align with the Teachings of Jesus?
- 📝 Why is rejection of the Trinity heresy, and not just wrong? (Protestant perspective)
- 📝 Why did Adam claim he was "naked" before God when he and Eve had clothed themselves with fig leaves?
- 📝 Why was the Bible not available to common people in the Medieval period?
- 📝 When did the Orthodox and Catholic Churches distinguish the manner in which the Sign of the Cross was to be made?
- 📝 Why is the Nation of Israel called Israel and not Abraham?
- 📝 Why did the soldiers go backward and fall down when Jesus said "I am he" in John 18:6?
- 📝 Why do LDS use water and leavened bread in communion when the Jews used wine and unleavened bread?
- 📝 When and how was the doctrine of the one divine will established?
- 📝 Why was the epistle of Clement to Corinth not considered canonical?
- 📝 Why was Jesus called Jesus, and not Immanuel?
- 📝 Since when did the Catholic church accept Protestant baptism, and what was the original rationale for accepting?
- 📝 Why was the Apostle Paul seemingly not that interested in baptizing believers?
- 📝 Why did the disciples cast lots when the Holy Spirit was promised
- 📝 Why does Jesus have to be fully God and fully man? Is it not sufficient to be the son of God and fully man?
- 📝 Why (and when) did the Apostles stop requiring exactly twelve apostles? Why was James not replaced?
- 📝 According to the LDS church, why was Jesus Christ born when he was born?
- 📝 Why did God not want man to have the knowledge of good and evil?
- 📝 When was Jesus anointed and who did the anointing?
- 📝 If we will have free will and be sinless in Heaven at the same time, then why did God not create a world with sinless free creatures to begin with?
