A woman's testimony was considered inadmissible in a court of law. Whose law?
score:2
Transistor I feel you. I think oftentimes the answer is not clear but many Christians take comfort in believing all of their church's teachings and their apologists' arguments are valid. When I ask questions about the premises or certain details which seem to be contradictory I am often told not that the answer isn't really known or that the answerer disagrees, but I am wrong and should read a book. In the majority of cases I suspect the person answering knows less than I do about the subject but just doesn't want to be seen admitting that something they believe might be false. Even if it is a modern doctrine. I think this is unfortunate as it has led to many religious splits and wars.
Anyway, in this case if you look at Jewish rabbinical law from the Talmud, women are generally not considered admissible witnesses in a courtroom. Here are sources:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testimony_in_Jewish_law
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0021_0_21003.html -- see Women
Since the Talmud was written by the rabbis who were codifying Jewish law in the tradition of the pharisees starting a mere 100 years after Jesus, it seems likely that this was Jewish law generally at the time when Israel had its own courts.
We are talking here about court testimony, though. How men reacted to women is a related but different matter. The opinions about women as witnesses may have spilled over to the disciples - but given that Jesus freely included women among his group and they were all like a big family, I doubt that this is a criterion for embarrassment any more than other mentions of Mary Magdalene in the Biblical as well as Gnostic gospels.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Magdalene
Moreover another problem for the argument that the gospel writers "wouldn't have put women" as the first ones to see the tomb is the way this information is treated. Luke specifically pointsout that a bunch of women talking about the body no being there didnt make any sense:
http://biblehub.com/luke/24-11.htm
To me it is much more curious that the subsequent verses describe people talking and walking with Jesus, but not recognizing him. It is interesting what the notion of resurrection really was. These stories all have a bit of a mystical quality.
But to answer your question - yes there is a precedent to suppose that women's testimony was not usually admissible in court and this may have affected the disciples. But these werent just any women, they were the ones who were by Jesus' side when the men had fled. They were around for years and part of the family. It could have been that the disciples didn't believe because the women had trouble relaying such an event.
Consider this also: the gospels differ on what the women saw. As for the centurions who saw things, the gospels claim they were bribed by Jews to say nothing happened. Here is Matthew 27 on the events before the burial:
"51At that moment the curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom. The earth shook, the rocks split 52and the tombs broke open. The bodies of many holy people who had died were raised to life. 53They came out of the tombs after Jesus’ resurrection ande went into the holy city and appeared to many people.
54When the centurion and those with him who were guarding Jesus saw the earthquake and all that had happened, they were terrified, and exclaimed, “Surely he was the Son of God!”
55Many women were there, watching from a distance. They had followed Jesus from Galilee to care for his needs. 56Among them were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James and Joseph, and the mother of Zebedee’s sons."
The whole thing sounds a bit fantastical - we don't find reports of resurrected saints anywhere else. But assuming this was true, then:
1) Resurrections and coming out of tombs already occurred on a large scale so it's strange why the disciples couldnt believe it happened again.
2) The centurions were already so impressed they were convinced that Jesus was the Son of God. So it's a wonder how they were able to be bribed by Jews to say nothing happened after witnessing the empty tomb of Jesus. Why was the money that big of a deal to them at that point?
To me these are bigger questions than why women saw the empty tomb first.
Upvote:2
This is only an indirect answer to part of your question, but I get the feeling that the non-historical part of this apologetic is not being expressed in a satisfying manner, either in your question or in the existing answer.
(I just wrote a very long sentence to try and explain it better, but figured that would not help. Let's try by analogy):
Today you've decided to create a new religion. But to get it off the ground, you need something BIG and flashy to have happened (even though you know it hasn't).
Whatever. It's you writing the history, so you can invent anything you like. Let's say... your religious hero turned a dog into a camel.
Of course, just writing it isn't very believable, it would be good to back it up with some eyewitnesses. And better to make them really convincing eyewitnesses: like scientists, or lawyers, or teachers, or something.
Not a three year old.
Bringing that back to the gospel accounts: if they had been making it up, then it would be more likely that they'd invent a different source than women, who were not considered credible witnesses.
Therefore, the fact that they did chose to reference female witnesses implies that they weren't making it up (or that they were really bad liars...)
Of course, that argument falls a bit flat if women were actually considered to be reliable witnesses. Thanks to Gregory's answer, it would seem that the argument still holds water.
More post
- 📝 What is the LDS stance on John 14:9-10?
- 📝 Jesus... the word became flesh
- 📝 Why do folks clasp their hands and bow their heads when praying?
- 📝 Was the KJV "too highly colored in many places with the party ideas and opinions of those who made it"?
- 📝 What is the biblical evidence against a pre-incarnate Jesus?
- 📝 How do Bible scholars reconcile the differences between Greek and Aramaic in John 21:15-17?
- 📝 Can Catholics participate in a regime or administration that lies to protect its people?
- 📝 How do believers in the dead being conscious explain the absence of reports about afterlife experiences by Lazarus and other resurrected individuals?
- 📝 Were the medieval popes examined on a toilet-lid-like chair to establish their masculinity?
- 📝 Can people who don’t believe, yet don’t not believe in Jesus Christ, still make it into heaven if they’re a good person?
- 📝 Which are the parts of the Old Testament that point to Jesus?
- 📝 According to Latter-day Saint epistemology, do Latter-day Saints perceive the witness of the Holy Ghost as an intrinsic defeater-defeater?
- 📝 Is the Roman Catholic understanding of forgiveness different from the Protestant understanding?
- 📝 Why do priests wear a white collar?
- 📝 Why the Western European style names?
- 📝 When, and by whom, did what we now call Easter Sunday first become known as Resurrection Sunday?
- 📝 Was the Obadiah in 1 Kings 18 the same Obadiah who wrote the Book of Obadiah?
- 📝 How do Unitarians respond to quotations from Ignatius of Antioch that seem to show Ignatius believes Jesus is God?
- 📝 Was charging interest on loans ever forbidden to laymen in the Eastern Orthodox Church? If so, when was this promulgated and when was it revoked?
- 📝 On the body of Satan and Holy Ghost and angels according to Mormons
- 📝 Must a Christian accept the Bible to be infallible and/or inerrant?
- 📝 How would Mormon christology be classified?
- 📝 According to Catholicism, how can a Christian be freed from the concupiscence of the flesh and thereby possess a sinless body?
- 📝 What scriptural arguments for the Trinity were used in the First Council of Nicea?
- 📝 Where did Aquinas say that the "greatest penalty of sin is the loss of the sense of sin"?
- 📝 Authenticity of the Pontius Pilate's letter to Tiberius Caesar?
- 📝 Abraham's bosom and Praying to Abraham
- 📝 Ex-muslim, How to pray?
- 📝 What arguments from scripture are given by Baptists for the belief that one third of the angels were banished from heaven with Satan?
- 📝 Why do Jehovah's Witnesses hold a "commemoration of the death of Jesus Christ"?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 A woman's testimony was considered inadmissible in a court of law. Whose law?
- 📝 In what way was the Law of Moses "a good thing whose purpose had now been accomplished"?
- 📝 Was the near-stoning of the adulterous woman something to be considered common practice, or was it strictly to trick Jesus?
- 📝 Why was the epistle of Clement to Corinth not considered canonical?
- 📝 Was Islam originally considered to be a Christian sect?
- 📝 At what date in history was the last papal anathema officially applied through the death penalty in a papal court against a heretic or protestant?
- 📝 Was the Book of the Law (Torah) ever kept inside the Ark of the Covenant?
- 📝 Was "eye for an eye" law in the O.T. imperative or only permissive?
- 📝 Were the Gospels considered Scripture when the rest of the New Testament was written?
- 📝 Why was Esther not sinning when she broke the law and approached the king?
- 📝 Was Origen and/or certain teachings considered a heretic and/or heretical?
- 📝 What was the Law of God Before Moses and How was It Disseminated?
- 📝 In whose name was Jesus baptized?
- 📝 What did C.S. Lewis’s think was pity without moral law leading to terror?
- 📝 Was It Possible or Not To Keep the Law of Moses?
- 📝 Was Modalism (or "modalistic language") ever considered to not contradict orthodox trinitarian beliefs?
- 📝 Do Protestants believe it is easier for New Testament believers to fulfill the moral law than it was before Christ?
- 📝 Did the early Church fathers believe the Law of Moses was never able to justify?
- 📝 Are the early followers of Christ considered Christians or Jews in today's context? If not, when was the religion created?
- 📝 Was there no word for son in law in Biblical Koine Greek?
- 📝 Was the theory of many extraterrestrial worlds considered blasphemous by the Roman Catholic Church during the 16th century?
- 📝 How was Solomon considered one of the wisest?
- 📝 Was the matter of whether the Christians who had renounced their faith under torture should be accepted back considered in the First Council?
- 📝 Was this act of Abbâ Arsenius considered commendable?
- 📝 How do we understand that the law was given by angels
- 📝 Why was Jehu considered a "bad" king of Israel?
- 📝 What was the charge that was given by the Jewish court to Jesus?
- 📝 Why is Christianity considered a monotheistic religion?
- 📝 Was baptism practiced before Christ?
- 📝 How long was Jesus in the tomb?
