Is there a definition of history separate from the definition of politics?
score:10
When we use historical methods and sources we're doing history. When we use influence and governance, we're doing politics. The distinction between history and politics isn't in the event, it is in your relationship to the event and the use to which you're trying to put the event.
If I research the legal status of Kosovo with an intent to determine how a fully independent Kosovo will affect my country, I'm doing politics. If I research the legal status of Kosovo with an intent of understanding the effect of the status of Kosovo on the evolving definition of a nation-state, then I'm probably doing history.
If I research WWII with the intent of understanding how the Clivedon set incorporated fiscal conservatism with secular chauvinism, I'm probably doing history. If on the other hand I research the Clivedon set with the intent of understanding the fundamental hypocrisy of secular chauvinism and fiscal conservatism, and the specific intent of understanding how that hypocrisy can be manipulated, I'm probably doing politics.
Update: An even better example just occurred to me - A close friend of mine is studying the adoption of the US constitution to determine whether secession is legal; if it is legal, then it supports certain conclusions about states rights, and the role of the Federal government. I'm discussing it with him because I'm interested in how the states came together to form a union, and how that concept of union evolved over time. From your perspective, the Constitution is history - a done deal. From his perspective, it is an element in a political discussion. From my perspective it is a fascinating era in history.
Contrary to your assertion, no historical event is ever "ended" - they all have implications for the current day. That's what Santayana means when he says that those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
Upvote:3
I think that what you're attempting to find an answer for is the basis of one of the ideas introduced by James Loewen in his book Lies My Teacher Told Me. In it, he distinguishes between what he calls "sasha" history (history which is still remembered by people who are alive toay) and "zamani" history (history which is now, essentially, dead and academic). World War II and the Hiroshima bombing were in the sasha realm as recently as the mid-90s when the Smithsonian Institute wished to put up a rather British style display on the subject (by which I mean even-handed and not flattering to the home country) but was denied in favor of a more Bowdlerized version of the events. Likewise, American slavery is clearly in the zamani zone of history but the legacy of racism and inequality which stem from it is clearly not.
That being said, there is no real dividing line between the two subjects, even though they do cover different things. History gets politicized all the time, but so too does politics learn from and adapt to the lessons of history.
To take the particular case of Kosovo, it's pretty recent history and so very clearly in the sasha range. You don't even have to be all that old to remember the conflicts in the former Yugoslavia in the 90s or for that matter the tribunals which were held in the early 2000s (the first of their kind since the 40s, if memory serves). It is unsurprising that people feel this is politics at this point; a great parallel with some of that situation are the Nuremberg Trials, about which a teleplay was written and shown in the late 1950s in the US but which was very heavily Bowdlerized due to the politics of the time (for example, Westinghouse demanded that the creators excise any reference to "gassing" lest the people of America associate gas ovens with Zyklon-B and Auschwitz). Ironically, this politicization of what is now a purely historical event is itself history. There's some kind of Inception joke here which I am sure could be made by a funnier person.
So long story short, there's not a real dividing line but that doesn't mean a distinction does not exist. 20 years is clearly too soon to separate politics from history. 50 years still seems pretty soon nowadays, depending on the event we're talking about: think of the JFK assassination as an example on one side (an event remembered by schoolchildren, many of whom are only in their 50s and 60s now) and the Bay of Pigs invasion on the other (something which was pretty big news to adults, but that cohort is now in their 70s and 80s and beginning to die off). World War II itself is probably pretty firmly into zamani territory by now, although it's interesting to not (as above) that as recently as 20 years ago it was not. World War I is without question zamani history.
Upvote:4
You will not get anywhere by trying to divide events as historical or political. The same thing can be both, and it depends on how you approach it. History is any event that is approached with a historical mindset - using the tools of historical research. A political scientist or political commentator could approach the same events as political events. The distinction is not in the event.
Therefore, I don't think you can set any cutoff point to determine if something is an historical event or not. Even a current event happening live - like, perhaps, Russia annexing the Crimea - is a historical event. Good commentary on it would involve a political commentator to give a political explanation of what is happening, but also a historian to give the historical perspective. Events do not occur in a vacuum, and there's always an historical context.
The same can be applied to any relevant discipline. A movie comes out. Is this a cultural event? An historical event? An entertainment-history event? The answer is, of course, all of the above, depends on how you interpret it.
More post
- 📝 Did any nation have a demonstrable qualitative advantage in their soldiers of the 18th century, and how did they achieve this?
- 📝 May I know more about the theory of "long period" - with regard to the interpretation of historical events?
- 📝 Adapting clothes, weapons, tools and customs from other nations in the middle ages - judging plausability
- 📝 What changes happened in law enforcement and criminal trials during the Nazi era in Germany?
- 📝 Can you identify this Soviet uniform from the 1970s to ~90s
- 📝 Napoleon's exploits in 1785
- 📝 Is there any good reason to call the German Emperor "the Kaiser", implying something uniquely German about him?
- 📝 When and where did Louis Blanc say the famous "from each according to his abilities..."?
- 📝 Did John Wesley pray because he had not been persecuted in three days?
- 📝 Where are the Dorians from?
- 📝 What was the average height of Roman men and women?
- 📝 Why didn't Aboriginal Australians invent agriculture?
- 📝 Other than Mr. Putin, has there been occassion of an ex-secret agent becoming the primary executive power holder?
- 📝 Is there evidence of a pagan temple on the site of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem that predated the Jewish Temple?
- 📝 Was it widespread during the 17th and 18th Century for British country people to be evicted and replaced with more profitable agriculture?
- 📝 Other examples of Enclave created for protection of a Mixed Race
- 📝 In the US Civil War, what factors contributed to the Union having such a numerical advantage over the Confederacy?
- 📝 Why isn't there a single trace of Germanic influence in Iberian Languages?
- 📝 Why were/are mines ever considered sensible as a weapon?
- 📝 Where did a ship's navigator usually work?
- 📝 What were the limitations on possession of wealth in Soviet Russia and how were they enforced?
- 📝 Ancient Isis Origin
- 📝 Historically accurate WW2 simulation
- 📝 Did medieval archers shoot from both sides of the bow?
- 📝 What are some examples of Enlightenment works that would definitively not be Romantic?
- 📝 Couldn't Japan have solved the problem of drifting at sea?
- 📝 Is there any documentation regarding the use of war elephants in battles?
- 📝 Historical precedent for using bodyguards as special forces?
- 📝 Did the Babylonian priesthood flee to Pergamum?
- 📝 German private property and homes returned after founding of republic?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Is there a definition of history separate from the definition of politics?
- 📝 What evidence is there that English Political divisions from the 1600s are replicated in American politics today?
- 📝 What examples from history are there of a dictator successfully annexing countries by force over the long term?
- 📝 Is there any documented criticism of the brutality of the Colosseum from citizens at the time?
- 📝 Has there ever been a major migration from the New World to the Old World? If not, why?
- 📝 Has there ever been a true kidnapped princess from anywhere in the world?
- 📝 Why did Canada, Australia and New Zealand separate from the UK?
- 📝 Were there reasons for Japan to go to war with the US aside from the US owning Philippines?
- 📝 How is the discipline of History differentiated from other disciplines in social sciences or the humanities?
- 📝 Why are there no photorealistic paintings from the old days?
- 📝 Are there any existing foreign language teaching texts from the Ancient Near East?
- 📝 Are there any historians who believe that the crusades were not motivated as a distraction from internal conflicts?
- 📝 Why has there only been one dynasty in the history of Japan?
- 📝 Is there a symbol associated with Loki from the Norse pantheon?
- 📝 Was there a state in history where influence of sport fans on politics was greater than in medieval Byzantine Empire?
- 📝 Are there any good sources on the history of the name for Kazakhstan?
- 📝 Are there any antisemitic caricatures from France during the interwar period?
- 📝 Was there a time when a Senator was wheeled in from the hospital to cast a deciding vote not to do something?
- 📝 Is there support for the theory that the 1918 influenza resulted from churning up microbe-laden French soil?
- 📝 Apart from the White Ship in 1120, have there been any other maritime disasters in which an heir to a throne and/or many notable people died?
- 📝 Are there any surviving maps from the Delhi Sultanate?
- 📝 Were there revolts in or escapes from the Austrofascist camps?
- 📝 Is there a standard authority on the textual history of the authors of antiquity?
- 📝 What proportion of the Arab population of Palestine pre-1948 came from families that lived there before 1880?
- 📝 Is there evidence that Harald Bluetooth died from an arrow to the rear?
- 📝 What makes studying science different from studying the history of science?
- 📝 Are there any Midas portraits from the ancient era?
- 📝 Are there any misunderstandings in history that were resolved in the 20th century?
- 📝 Is there any economic history account of the role of Japan's precious metal deposits in the roles of the country's early industrialization?
- 📝 Are the historical sources from the ancient history trustable?
