How did knights who required glasses to see survive on the battlefield?
score:44
They Didn't Wear Glasses and They were Probably Fine
TL/DR: They didn't wear glasses and all but the blindest of knights were at no more a disadvantage than a guy who was slightly shorter or weaker or slower than average.
As mentioned previously the kinds of glasses available to a medieval aristocrat were essentially impossible to use on a battlefield. But that's not a huge hindrance. A knight's ability too see clearly would not have a tremendously bad effect on his combat capability until you get in the range of near-blindness. You must consider the ranges at which the average knight was fighting. My own vision is atrocious, in the 20/400 range. Anything outside of about 20cm gets fuzzy, and I have difficulty identifying individuals at distances greater than 3 meters unless they're especially tall/short/weird hair color or the only person of a specific race in the room. 20/400 is "legally blind" without corrective lenses. But I can (and have) done ARMA-style fights without corrective lenses. I can still see motion at 3 meters, even slight movements. and I can also perceive objects like, say, a spear or a sword moving at that range. Even from 20ish meters away I can still identify things like "that's a person" and "that person is moving towards/away/sideways as about X speed" and can roughly distinguish the size of a weapon they're carrying. (I can tell if something a spear or a sword, but not really a spear or a halberd for instance) What does that mean for a knight with a similar impairment?
Honestly not a whole lot. Certainly a GENERAL might have problems, as he would not be able to easily identify troop formations or banners at a distance. But your average knight was a close-combat specialist fighting either on foot or mounted. On foot he's coming within a few feet of his opponent, where his vision is "good enough" to allow him to fight with confidence, especially against an armored opponent where subtleties like facial cues don't matter and fights often ended in grappling. Against mounted opponents he'd be at a slight disadvantage, but if his reflexes were good enough he could still get his lance's final aimpoint on target. As he's part of a larger formation somebody else will be able to point him at the enemy. Unlike the movies battles didn't devolve in wild mixed-in melees so as long as he stayed "pointed" the right direction so he didn't go running up to foes he thought were friends until he was 3 meters away he'd be ok!
At the end of the day it certainly is a bit more challenging to fight without good vision than with my contacts in. But I wouldn't rate it much more difficult than fighting a guy who has slightly longer reach or is slightly stronger or any of the other minor advantages that nature bestows on people. A knight isn't trying to see a thin flitting rapier, and catching arrows on your shield is a matter of luck and good positioning rather than seeing the arrow coming. A knight is trying to see fairly large objects at fairly close range, and at that point even the just-barely-legally-blind can do ok!
Upvote:4
In addition to the other posts, I would just like to add that helmets would probably produce a minor pinhole effect which would slightly reduce some optical abnormalties.
Upvote:6
I haven't studied this at all. But common sense would lead someone to one of two conclusions. If your vision was enough of a problem that you had difficulty carrying out your knightly duties, either: a. You didn't become a knight in the first place b. You died quickly in battle
I suppose you might get lucky, become a knight, and never get called to battle. But that strikes me as extraordinary luck...
Upvote:65
According to Wikipedia glasses were invented in 1268 by Roger Bacon. About a century later, the first wearable glasses appear on a painting by Thomasso da Modena in 1352.
Glasses were rudimentary at best, and very expensive to make. The only people who wore glasses were wealthy scholars, because of technical limitations: those glasses were only good enough (barely) for reading. Glasses of this period were only capable of correcting presbyopia (not being able read, common for elderly people). If you accept the distortions, and didn't mind wearing or holding something very uncomfortable for extended periods. A scholar or merchant used glasses in a sedentary environment. Wearing those kind of glasses in any other environment was not practical. Least of all on a battlefield.
That's where your problem lies: a knight didn't need reading glasses, supposing they could read. Many of them couldn't. They needed to cope with myopia, or short-sightedness. That's the opposite of what glasses at the time could assist with.
The technology to create wearable glasses in a helmet or on the battlefield simply didn't exist. Glasses that help with short-sightedness weren't invented during medieval times, but long afterwards. Wearable glasses as we use to day appeared around 1727.
More post
- π Did the Portuguese get anything in return when they handed back Macau?
- π Was Vox In Rama a factor of the quick spread of the Black Plague?
- π How did ships acquire targets beyond the horizon in WWI?
- π Why did Michigan abolish capital punishment so early?
- π What politics were implemented to accomplish the Christian tradition and try to keep what is written in the Holy Bible?
- π Why did piracy thrive in the late 17th and early 18th centuries?
- π What do these terms in Caesar's Gallic Wars mean?
- π Total budget of Nuremberg trial
- π Why Finland received so little foreign support during the winter war?
- π Is there any evidence that Jesus' Mother lived in Ephesus?
- π Why was John Brown's raid on Harper's Ferry treason?
- π Which operating system were the hackers at the MIT AI Lab using in 1971?
- π What was the historical prevalance of inherited chattel slavery?
- π Post-war plan for Nazi Germany in Russia?
- π Use of war elephants in Egypt
- π What is it called when a Corporation purchases the rights to something to prevent it's production, to increase profit
- π How long was the overland trip between St. Petersburg and Okhotsk?
- π I'm reading The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. What should I watch out for?
- π What were Hiroshima and Nagasaki known for prior to World War II?
- π Symbol on utility pole in photograph from 1906
- π In the Middle Ages, adultery was strictly condemned by the Church. How did Kings justify their extra-marital affairs?
- π Do any Byzantine maps survive?
- π Why was John Paul Jones pardoned in Whitehaven in 1999?
- π Why did it take so long for humanity to be able to cross the oceans?
- π Which is the oldest language in the World?
- π Why didn't the British consider the USS President's attempted flight as a fake surrender?
- π Conscientious objectors in Germany during WWI
- π Why did the Arab League re-admit Egypt in 1989?
- π Why was A.K.Gastev purged in 1939?
- π Why did so many Italians emigrate to Argentina?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- π How did knights who required glasses to see survive on the battlefield?
- π How did 300,000 people survive the 3 1/2 year siege of Sarajevo?
- π How did Medieval armies survive the use of mail armor in the deserts of the Middle East?
- π How did Roman armies survive in the desert?
- π How did the Carthaginians manage to survive three years of siege?
- π Who was 'Viscount Yi' and what did he do to survive in the court of a madman?
- π How did CeauΘescu survive the condemnation of the invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968?
- π How did the forces required for invading Norway compare to those actually used for invading North Africa?
- π How did the white minority in South Africa see their situation in the apartheid times?
- π How did Germany survive on the Eastern Front of WW2 for so long?
- π How did Yugoslavia economically survive the Cold War
- π How did soldiers in WWI who wore jackboots keep the boots from being sucked off in the mud?
- π How did knights in full suits of armor eventually die in combat? What were the most common causes of death for soldiers in full-body plate armor?
- π How did the generation who elected Rutherford B. Hayes and Benjamin Harrison feel about the electoral college?
- π How did the written Polish language survive in eastern Germany during partition (if it survived at all)?
- π How and when did the word "nuclear" replace the word "atomic"?
- π How did Israel win the Six-Day War?
- π How did the general population of England convert so smoothly to Protestantism?
- π How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?
- π How did the Romans do division?
- π When and how did the USA and the UK become allies?
- π How did the authorities not find the speakeasy clubs during the prohibition?
- π How did such a relatively minor event as the assassination of an archduke start World War I?
- π How did the Roman state verify citizenship?
- π Why did Europe not see Roman-era numbers of men participating in battles until the 17th century?
- π How did the Nazis plan to defeat America during World War II?
- π How did the ancient Romans count with their fingers?
- π How did the American Civil War help the U.S economy recover from the Panic of 1857 given that civil wars are extremely destructive?
- π How did the ancient Greeks synchronize time?
- π How did early adopters of the automobile fill up their cars?
