Why did the French "surrender" all of its troops during the armistice in World War II?
score:2
Tens of thousands of prisoners of war were taken between the 17th and the 22nd of June.
Then Président du Conseil (Head of Government) and Chief of Armies Philippe Pétain made a huge blunder when he announced on radio the 17th of June, 1940, that France was seeking an armistice with Germany and that
The fight must be stopped.
"il faut cesser le combat"
The consequence on the moral of French troops was devastating :
La phrase "C'est le coeur serré que je vous dis aujourd'hui qu'il faut cesser le combat" sème la consternation. Interprétée comme un cessez-le-feu, de nombreuses unités déposent les armes.
The sentence: "It is with a heavy heart that I tell you today that the fighting must stop" caused consternation. Interpreted as a cease-fire, many units lay down their arms.
The blunder was quickly noticed by the minister of foreign affairs Paul Baudouin, and the printed version of Petain's speech in the evening newspaper was amended into
je vous dis aujourd'hui qu'il faut tenter de cesser le combat.
I tell you today that we must try to stop fighting.
(my emphasis on the two added words)
However this is hardly less clumsy and didn't avoid misunderstandings.
Indeed, many troops that were facing advancing german units then stopped fighting or retreating and surrendered themselves to Germans, expecting to be released quickly. That's when the majority of captures happened:
La majorité des captures ont eu lieu après l'annonce de la demande d'armistice par le maréchal Pétain. Ceux qui ont alors été faits prisonniers, qu'ils aient combattu jusqu'au bout ou qu'ils se soient livrés, avaient des raisons d'espérer être libéré rapidement, une fois l'armistice signé.
The majority of the captures took place after the announcement of the armistice request by Marshal Pétain. Those who were then taken prisoner, whether they fought to the limit or surrendered, had reason to hope to be released quickly, once the armistice was signed.
However, the armistice had still not been agreed upon and would not be until the 22nd. Until that date, the Germans had no reason to treat captured enemies as anything other than prisoners of war, who would continue to be an important bargaining chip in Hitler's hands for the next three years.
Upvote:-1
As noted in the OP, armstice means a ceasefire - not a peace agreement. Formally Vichy France and Germany remained in the state of war till the end of their existence.
The situation was militarily lost in June 1940, to the extent that the French had no means to prevent German army from overrunning the metropolitan France. Thetefore, the last days of the Raynaud's government (before Pétain became the prime minister) were centered on the choice between seeking peace with Germans and the capitulation.
Capitulation meant acknowledging military defeat: the army would surrender, but the state of war would still exist, and the government could continue the war from the French colonies.
Peace agreement meant placing the responsibility for war on the politicians, and essentially acknowledging that the German cause was just.
Unsurprisingly, the generals opposed the capitulation, i.e., accepting the blame for the defeat. And Hitler had good reasons to let them have a small part of the French mainland in exchange for their collaboration. The French prisoners of war played a part of hostages - Pétain has actively sought their release (via making a peace agreement), using this as one of justifications for closer collaboration with Germans, whereas Hitler did not trust that France would remain pro-German, once it had its soldiers back. It is also necessary to note that, despite the collaboration, Vichy France never formally joined the war on the German side.
Upvote:5
There were already numerous French soldiers taken as prisonners of war when the Armistice happened.
2/ Those prisonners of war could have been paroled, but the Germans did not trust France. OP mentionned Dutch army as an example to follow, however while Dutch army was small and easily beaten, France was an other matter. The Germans, in 1940, could not take the risk.
Later on, the Germans, with more confidence in themselves and in neutrality in war and internal collaboration of Vichy France, established the "STO" (mandatory work service): they litterally "trade" prisoners of war in exchange of workers in german industries. Note that this was not always a good trade since sabotage of the production happened, example given Herman Buchner's Focke Wulf 190 in 1943.
1/ For the 1918 example: the difference is that war ended everywhere in 1918, which was not the case in 1940. So we fall back into the 2/ case of the Germans wanted a "security" with those prisoners of war. Again, note that French prisoners of war were used as workers, especially as farmers because German campaigns had lost their men to the army. So those prisoners of war had value.
3/ This could be a possibility, but again already numerous soldiers had been taken as prisoners of war. Note that remaining units, as in the Alpes mountains, that were not defeated by the Germans in 1940 stayed "free" as units of French Vichy's army. So does for colonial units. I think the solution of disbanding soldiers to avoid capture was used, but I can't find back sources so it might be a mistake from my memory.
4/ Nobody in the French government by that time had the willingness to fight to the last man. But some French units, like former mentionned in Alpes mountains, did.
More post
- 📝 How is the term "medieval" used to describe non-European civilizations and cultures?
- 📝 Zoroastrianism and Hinduism
- 📝 How was law enforcement handled in large US cities before professional police?
- 📝 Did the U.S. actively encourage discord between the Soviets and Chinese?
- 📝 Why was the "first Monday in December" originally chosen as the default meeting date for Congress?
- 📝 Why did Hitler treat the Slavs inconsistently?
- 📝 Where and how did pinky promises / swear originate?
- 📝 Did the Roman testudo protect the sides of the formation?
- 📝 What's the rationale for shipping coins back to Spain from its colonies?
- 📝 What does "the purpose of history is ideological" mean?
- 📝 Was Hiroshima targeted because its mountains would "rebound the explosion back into the city for more damage"?
- 📝 What were the trade routes between Mapungubwe and other civilizations?
- 📝 What types of weapons did the British army use in the late 1890's?
- 📝 What Was the Constitutional Basis that Made Pompey "Consul Without Colleague" for 52BC
- 📝 Book recommendation on the Nazis for a (very) advanced reader
- 📝 Why did Roman women have no praenomen?
- 📝 Can anyone help me identify this Coat of Arms?
- 📝 How many languages did Zhang Shenfu speak?
- 📝 Did the first emperor of China die of mercury poisoning?
- 📝 What role did War elephants play in the battle of Thermopylae?
- 📝 Why were the British Union of Fascist outfits so bad compared to the Nazis?
- 📝 What was a "census" (some sort of compensation) in early medieval Europe?
- 📝 17th century Japanese colonies in Southeast Asia?
- 📝 How was 'the right to bear arms' understood in 17th-18th century England?
- 📝 How many of Japan's 29 lost Pearl Harbor aircraft have been accounted for?
- 📝 Were there any well known royal dynasties that did not in some way cite religious mandate for their rule?
- 📝 Significance of division of Caledonia by Northumbrian Advance
- 📝 Was there a massacre in the Algerian war calculated to provoke French reprisals?
- 📝 Why didn't Chiang mention technological self-reliance?
- 📝 Did the break up of AT & T in 1984 lead to technological innovation?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Why did the French "surrender" all of its troops during the armistice in World War II?
- 📝 Why did the French Army melt film during WWI?
- 📝 Why did Sparta turn on its ally Elis during the First Macedonian War?
- 📝 During and right after the French Revolution, how did France maintain and operate such a big army all over Europe?
- 📝 At the Battle of Waterloo, why did the French army throw so many troops into the fight for Hougoumont?
- 📝 How did the British and French train their troops during the colonial eras?
- 📝 Why did the French return all the Dutch Colonies to the Netherlands in Paris Treaty?
- 📝 Did French troops use chemical weapons during the Siege of Laghouat in 1852?
- 📝 Why did the Germans spare Allied troops trapped at Dunkirk?
- 📝 Why did Poland keep Warsaw as its capital instead of returning it to Krakow in the 20th century?
- 📝 Why did the Republic of China retract its simplified Chinese characters?
- 📝 Why did the Soviet Union out-pace the US during the space-race?
- 📝 Why did Italy abandon its alliance with Germany in WW1 and join the Allied side?
- 📝 Why did the French sell Louisiana?
- 📝 Given their reputation for fighting to the last man in the Pacific, why did 700,000 Japanese troops surrender in Manchuria?
- 📝 Why did the Soviet Union close its borders and restrict travel abroad?
- 📝 Why did the Allies Invade French North Africa?
- 📝 Why did the Dutch, French & British acquire minor colonies in South America?
- 📝 Why did the Mongols destroy the library during the siege of Baghdad in 1258?
- 📝 Did Northern troops attempt to re-enslave African Americans in Southern plantations during the Civil War?
- 📝 Why did Churchill become the PM of Britain during WWII instead of Lord Halifax?
- 📝 Why did the Soviets not shoot down US spy satellites during the Cold War?
- 📝 Why did the Arabs start the 1973 War during Ramadan, and did it affect their performance?
- 📝 Why did Guinea vote so differently in the 1958 French constitutional referendum?
- 📝 Why did few French and no Dutch pilots (but many Poles and Czechs) take part in the Battle of Britain?
- 📝 Why did the French nobility adopt Calvinism?
- 📝 Why did the French insist on reclaiming Indo-China after WWII?
- 📝 Why did this anti-communist pamphlet, from the USA in the 1950s, include UNESCO among its targets?
- 📝 Why did anti-Chinese riots occur during the Indonesian Reformation of 1998?
- 📝 Why did Japan not withdraw from China as its pacific front was crumbling and the threat of US invasion imminent?
