How were heavily armored Cataphracts killed?

score:12

Accepted answer

Lighter, Faster Cavalry. The heavier the cavalry, the harder it is to maintain speed and perform sharp maneuvers. At the battle of Turin, Constantine used light cavalry with iron-tipped clubs to attack the flanks of Cataphracts. Ancient cavalry rode horses without Stirrups, meaning clubs or weapons with blunt force behind them stood a fair chance of knocking the rider from his horse, if the blow did not incapacitate him in the first place.

Constantine's more lightly armoured and mobile cavalry were able to charge in on the exposed flanks of the Maxentian cataphracts. Constantine's cavalry were equipped with iron-tipped clubs, ideal weapons for dealing with heavily armoured foes. Some Maxentian cavalrymen were unhorsed, while many others were variously incapacitated by the blows of clubs.

No armour is impenetrable.

Cataphract armour was famous for being extensive, even having their name derive from "Completely covered", but that doesn't mean impenetrable. The horses legs and face were still exposed, both of which are accessible to a well placed spear thrust or sword swing. The horse could throw off the rider, or even crush him in a fall. This of course would be much easier post-charge.

Chinese Statue of a Cataphract

Soldiers in great numbers

Shock cavalry are intended for the express purpose of one large initial charge, to break the enemy lines and with any luck, their morale. After the initial charge, shock cavalry could find themselves surrounded by hostile soldiers if the charge doesn't successfully break the line. In a large group, attacking from all sides, soldiers without pikes could attack either the horse or the rider in vulnerable spots in the armour, any mounted soldier that cannot turn to face every attacker will eventually receive a fatal blow.

Battlefield Defences

Caltrops could hinder the charge of a cataphract when used in great amounts. Wikipedia describes caltrops as:

"an antipersonnel weapon made up of two or more sharp nails or spines arranged in such a manner that one of them always points upward from a stable base".

These are primarily used to disrupt the movement of both foot soldiers and cavalry by slowing their advance. These date back to roman times, known then as 'tribulus', and have been used throughout history since.

In addition to that shallow trenches with outward facing, partially buried, wooden stakes also provide cover against cavalry, and will effectively prevent a charge.

Upvote:4

Disciplined infantry, whether armed with spears of swords or pikes, will almost always break the charge of heavy cavalry if they are well motivated and organised. The Romans came to know the devastating effect of properly timed charges from cataphracts and thus adapted their military greatly as a response to the lance armed cavalry fielded by both the Parthians and Sassanids. It is worth noting that the Persians relied on swarming missile fire in order to force the Romans into tight formations, whereby their cataphracts could charge successfully. The initial impetus of the charge would be devastating without doubt, but provided the Romans could loosen up and reorganize the Parthians would be forced to retreat (Those who didn't would be surrounded and killed.) Its also worth noting that most cataphracts had armor attaching the horse to the rider, meaning if the horse went down so to did the rider (game over) That being said, this combined arms use of cavalry was extremely effective against infantry, so the Romans had to come up with no ways to counter heavy cavalry.

Publius Ventidius Bassus is someone worth mentioning in this regard. In his campaign against the Parthians, Publius made sure his infantry was organised atop a slope or hill before battles. This would both negate the Cataphracts ability to outflank as well as severely reducing the charge impact. Any hors*m*n who tried to charge this formation was doomed. He also made sure his slingers were packed in close order behind his infantry (mainly as a response to horse archers) thirdly he made sure he had a sufficient force of light cavalry to harass the enemy cataphracts, as they were to slow to catch the unarmored roman cavalry. Publius's campaign was an embarrassment to the Parthians who had previously crushed the Romans at Carhae. In three separate battles he managed to trick the cataphracts into head-on charges against infantry, and the result was disaster for the cavalrymen. Another neat feature is that the Roman slingers were frighteningly effective against armored cavalry, more so than archers, as the blunt force was often enough to break bones through the cataphracts steel. Indeed the Parthian prince Pacorus took a led bullet from a sling to the helmet, and his skull was shattered (he died) Clearly Roman infantry, on its own terms could defeat Parthian cavalry, even being armed with swords. This was far from the only method, so I'll list a few historical scenarios quickly.

-At the battle of Nisibis, the Romans used caltrops to hamper the charge of cataphracts, where they then broke against the legions.

-At the Battle of Satala, the Romans stormed the Sassanid camp, Killing the hors*m*n in their sleep, and destroying the Royal Persian army.

  • At the battle of Ctesiphon (363) Julian ordered his infantry to charge, dive under the lances of the cavalry, and slice open their stomachs, which was one of the only unarmored parts of the cataphract

  • Emperor Carracalla managed to force the Parthian cataphracts to retreat from their own homeland after informing them that he had armed his infantry with pikes.

  • Aurelian managed to trick the Palmyrene cataphracts into chasing his lighter cavalry. once the cataphracts were exhausted, the Roman cavalry turned and charges, using spiked maces to break the armor.

-Ventidius Bassus managed to surround Pacorus's cataphracts, but instead of closing in with his infantry, he unleashed volleys of led bullets from slings, which reduced the armoured regiments to nothing.

there are many more examples, which i obviously don't have time to go into detail. Countering cataphracts was a matter of combined arms effort. A mixture of light cavalry, light infantry, and heavy Infantry proved more than capable against armoured hors*m*n.

or you could do what the Byzantines did. fight fire with fire, get your own cataphracts.

More post

Search Posts

Related post