How do historians agree on what common evidence should be used in the writing of history?
Upvote:1
Every historical essay has a different topic of inquiry and so will have a different legitimate source basis. Within this, however, an essay into a topic must be capable of supporting its claims with sources adequate for the scope of the claims and adequate to have had discovered refutation of the claims.
Usually this means the major archival holdings for agencies, or the appropriate archival topical search for claims not focused on an agent.
On top of this the essay must demonstrate its theoretical tools or concepts are not perverse, and assay the appropriate historiography and other fields' secondary literature.
In some areas particular kind as of primary source or their uses are considered perverse for certain claims based on source criticism. Repeated passing of laws, for example, generally means the law failed to regulate a social conduct.
The general process for agreement then is to publish and potentially be damned.
Upvote:6
The short answer is that all the available evidence should be examined when we are attempting to write history.
The question then becomes how do we use those sources.
I'm fairly sure I mentioned this on another answer, but it may be worth repeating.
Many years ago*, when I was studying the subject, my tutor suggested seven guidelines to help us evaluate the relative 'value' of historical sources:
- If all the sources agree about an event, we can consider the event proved.
- However, majority rule does not apply; Even if a majority of sources relate events in one way, that version will not be accepted unless it can pass the test of critical textual analysis.
- In general, a source where part of the account can be confirmed by referring to independent authorities, can probably be trusted in its entirety – even if it is impossible to similarly confirm the whole text.
- When two sources disagree on a particular point, we generally prefer the source with the most "authority". This will be the source created closest in time to the event in question, by a person with particular expertise, or by an eyewitness.
- In general, eyewitnesses are preferred, particularly when they are dealing with events known by most, or at least many, contemporaries.
- If two or more independently created sources agree on a matter, the reliability of each is reinforced.
- When multiple sources disagree, and we have no other means of evaluation which source is "best", then Occam's Razor applies. Good historians choose the source which seems to accord best with common sense.
(Ironically, she never quoted her source for these guidelines!).
Now, obviously, several of these guidelines are highly subjective - especially the last one! It is thus not surprising that interpretations of events based on the same evidence will often vary depending on the personal views or prejudices of particular historians.
*Almost so long ago that Pontius was still in training for his Pilate's licence, and Centurion was a rank and not a tank!
More post
- 📝 What was the efficiency of the "Gadget" bomb in the Trinity Test?
- 📝 Was there ever a democracy where the three branches went to war?
- 📝 Why was the Kashmir issue not completely solved at the end of Bangladesh Liberation War of 1971?
- 📝 Why is Kubb - a skittles game - associated with the Viking Age?
- 📝 Did monotheistic religions play a role in shaping the belief that political power should be in the hands of an all powerful monarch?
- 📝 Were any French aristocrats guillotined facing up?
- 📝 When and how did steel supplant iron for artillery?
- 📝 In a challenge to duel, what happened if a thrown gauntlet (and later, glove) was refused?
- 📝 Looking for a particular documentary about the history of long distance communication
- 📝 Newton a plagiarist?
- 📝 Why do some playing cards have only one eye?
- 📝 Were firearms used by the farmers for intimidation in the penny auctions during the Great Depression?
- 📝 What was the first "fashion trend"?
- 📝 Why were the Germans during the Nazi era so inventive?
- 📝 Why were ships-of-the line not supposed to open fire on frigates during fleet actions?
- 📝 What are some symbols representing peasants/oppressed persons fighting back?
- 📝 How did knights who required glasses to see survive on the battlefield?
- 📝 Have the arts ever moved borders?
- 📝 Have any artifacts or archaeological remains from the White Ship disaster of 1120 ever been recovered?
- 📝 What did the nobles do after the French Revolution?
- 📝 What went wrong with India's scientific development as a society?
- 📝 Is chain mail expensive?
- 📝 Why did England consistently adopt red as their primary colour for insignia and uniform?
- 📝 When did "&" stop being taught alongside the alphabet?
- 📝 Which battles of WWII did the cracking of Enigma decisively influence?
- 📝 What is an antimendicant?
- 📝 When did the Commonwealth of England start being considered a Republic?
- 📝 What was the origin and purpose of the "Montes"?
- 📝 Was the Titanic tragedy at least partly avoidable?
- 📝 What historical evidence do we have for the Prophet Muhammed?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 How do historians agree on what common evidence should be used in the writing of history?
- 📝 What evidence is there of the vision aids people used before the invention of eyeglasses in about 1286?
- 📝 What kind of evidence (if any) could be used to identify a large conquest in the time before writing?
- 📝 What is "discovery" in the historical sense? How do historians today view and describe "discoveries"?
- 📝 Have there been any major disagreements between historians over what sources should be used to interpret an event?
- 📝 How did knights in full suits of armor eventually die in combat? What were the most common causes of death for soldiers in full-body plate armor?
- 📝 What kinds of documents were forged in the middle ages and how common was forgery?
- 📝 How do historians and linguists know how to pronounce the names from non-phonetic scripts?
- 📝 What drugs were used in England during the High Middle Ages?
- 📝 How much evidence is there regarding the naval punishment of keelhauling?
- 📝 What is the evidence to claim that political order in ancient Rome was sufficiently different under "kingdom", "republic" and "empire"?
- 📝 On what basis do some historians accuse the British government of genocide during the great Irish famine?
- 📝 What is the earliest evidence of contact between Ireland and Egypt?
- 📝 How common was smoking in first half of the 20th century?
- 📝 How do historians know the details of a seemingly private event?
- 📝 What kind of labor was used to build the Egyptian pyramids?
- 📝 How did the Soviets decide what to annex in WW2?
- 📝 What historical reasons did the Nazis give for hating the Jews? How did they identify non-practicing Jews?
- 📝 How common was marriage between nobles and peasants in the Middle Ages?
- 📝 What was used instead of toilet paper in the US and the UK prior to 1900?
- 📝 What historical evidence is there for the existence of Jesus Christ? What do we know about him?
- 📝 What historical evidence do we have regarding the Lost Colony of Roanoke?
- 📝 How frequently were homing pigeons used in the World Wars?
- 📝 What should I call bands of armed men in the Middle Ages?
- 📝 What are the main reasons historians give for the Soviet Union's collapse?
- 📝 How common was it for people to live 80+ years in the 17th century?
- 📝 I'm reading The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. What should I watch out for?
- 📝 How common was it for un-documented ships to bring settlers to the American colonies 1700-1750
- 📝 What was the Nove / Millar debate, how is it important to the historiography of the Soviet Union?
- 📝 How many pens were used by MacArthur to end the final chapter of World War II and where are they now?
