Is external expansion an element of fascist ideology
score:3
Ideological fascism was probably compatible with the idea of conquest and expansion but without requiring it. Political fascism (the ideology as applied) probably required some attempts at expansion for more populist reasoning. The theorists, particularly the pre-1933 theorists, were more focused on the organization of society and the revitalization of the polity, in a way that would've been closer to a Romantic technocracy or something akin to the US Progressive movement of the time (but with an anarchist flair). But the actual fascist politicians and their supporters were far more prone to vicious revanchism, to a form of politics and policy that excelled at prejudice, violence, and irredentism.
Nietzsche articulated a number of concepts that the fascists later found useful, including the will to power, the ubermensch, master-slave morality, and so forth. These concepts discounted the idea of protecting the weak for moral reasons and in explaining the basis for power, but they didn't necessarily mandate war, conquest, or expansion. Of course, Nietzsche himself was not violent and was rather bookish; he served in a war but only as a non-combat medic and he renounced his Prussian citizenship, dying officially stateless.
The futurists were also an important ideological basis for fascism, and they often embraced political violence. Marinetti thought violence and war were good things and he merged the Futurists with the Italian Fascists, but even though he advocated war his statements were more about emotionally purifying violence and less about revanchism or expansion.
Of course, actual Fascist parties in Italy and Germany advocated expansion. But this seems to be more about the politics of expansion, irredentism, and revanchism, as well as the appeal of acquiring wealth and status for the populace, and rather less about the ideological purity of it all. It is also more popular to be nationalistic and jingoistic, so the political parties were more jingo than their ideological forebears.
Fascism is entirely congruent with expansion. Different impulses downplayed the need for moral limits and emphasized the virtues of strength, resilience, and power. And the argument for a strong central force to violently reshape a new society is incredibly amenable to those who would wage war to conquer territory and remake it in the image of their new society. But ideological fascism was less concerned with expansion than political fascism.
Upvote:-1
Italy in the 1930s was fascist yet not expansionist (the African colonies they'd owned since before the fascists took power).
Nazi Germany wasn't technically fascist (though Nazism has elements of fascism, just as does communism, the three are closely related ideologies).
So no, fascism doesn't dictate expansionism, which of course doesn't mean that a fascist society can't be expansionist.
Nazism is much more like communism, and probably gets its expansionist tendencies from there.
Upvote:-1
German, Japanese and Italian fascism were certainly expansionist. But some other undeniably fascist states did not engage in external expansion, for example Spain (Franco), Portugal (Salazar), Haiti (Duvalier father and son), South Africa (under apartheid), Iran (Reza Shah and son), Syria (Asad), France (Pétain) and some others I can think of.
Upvote:1
Is external expansion and aggressive militarism a consistent element of fascist ideology?
The answer is clearly yes if consistent means frequent, but seems to be no if consistent is assumed to mean systematic (seems to be because proving a negative is always quite hard). Fascist ideology is positively correlated with expansionism and aggressive militarism but a second key factor is the military might and general geopolitical position of the state in question. Fascist movements in powerful states (in absolute terms or relative to their neighbors) are overwhelmingly military aggressive and expansionist but fascist movements in weak states are not necessarily so and sometimes develop a symmetric Weltanschauung of defense against a dangerous external world, closed borders policies and withdrawal from international affairs.
Examples of such could be found in the ideology of the Swiss far right movements, starting with the Schweizerischer Vaterländischer Verband and Nationale Aktion: two movements which embraced many tenets of fascist ideologies but were not military expansionist (at least before the advent of Nazi power for the former). Based on its website, the New Zealand National Front does not seem particularly military expansionist either.
Upvote:5
Think of it this way. Contemporary to Mussolini and Hitler, every major European country had a "fascist" movement with a "national socialist" type ideology. Arrow Cross, Nasjonalsamling, Iron Guard, NSB, and so forth. All of them were variously "marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation, or victimhood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy, and purity."
They had a core of "committed nationalist militants" who were keen to abandon "democratic liberties" and pursue unconstrained "redemptive violence." Most were not "mass-based" unless you mean "plebian," and rarely came close enough to power to forge alliances with traditional elites. Since their ideologies were radicalized expressions of their respective nationalisms, they sought internal cleansing and external expansion accordingly.
If there's territorial revisionism and frustrated imperial aspirations in the nationalism, it will be amplified by the fascist ideology. I would look to the nationalism rather than the fascism for the "external expansion" and the "internal cleansing" and to the fascism for the sense of urgency and the political will to pursue it.
Likewise if a given nationalism tends to imagine the national community in a certain way, and a sense of political or social deadlock has emerged to frustrate it, its fascists will long for and assert an overarching unity. If the nationalism thinks in terms of blood and soil, then the fascism will glorify blood and soil. Otherwise it will idealize different aspects of the collective ego.
In the final analysis, fascism is a certain amount of "what do you need it to be for the purpose of your analysis". Only Mussolini's Italy was self-consciously "fascist," everyone else was a unique manifestation of the same urge/crisis in their respective national(ist) contexts.
More post
- 📝 How did people ensure that renaissance Papal election bribery was honored?
- 📝 The role of the two world wars in the evolution of Fordism
- 📝 Why don't/can't the different ethnolinguistic groups of people in erstwhile Yugoslavia get along with each other?
- 📝 Is biblical Joseph story historically valid?
- 📝 Why were the Japanese so much better at night flying early in WWII?
- 📝 How did the Germans get housing again after WWII?
- 📝 Who first wrote about deafness?
- 📝 What adaptations allowed left-handers to write left-to-right with dip pens?
- 📝 Were women allowed to study at the Library of Alexandria?
- 📝 Was the 18th century Russian peasant braver; or simply more afraid of Cossacks?
- 📝 Scholar-farmer-artisan-merchant social ordering in ancient/medieval China
- 📝 Which year was the first leap year?
- 📝 How did Rome's legal system work?
- 📝 Why did Germany officially acknowledge the contents of the Zimmerman telegram?
- 📝 In the First Barbary War, how long was the USS Philadelphia aground?
- 📝 When and what was the maximum extent of Nationalist China?
- 📝 Can anyone identify the military branch and rank of the man in the front row? This is from Germany @1932
- 📝 WW2: Did US marines and soldiers really go into action with unbuckled helmet chin straps?
- 📝 Why women in medieval India was topless?
- 📝 Did Greeks believe in the tangible existence of their gods?
- 📝 Is this 60's Atlanta airport security picture geniuine, and if so, what is happening here?
- 📝 When was the restaurant "invented" in Europe?
- 📝 Why did emperors of India and China have so many mistresses?
- 📝 At which point did election in a large country become feasible?
- 📝 What were the largest European treasuries, in gold and silver, at the end of the Seven Years War?
- 📝 Why did people have so many children in Victorian times?
- 📝 When did polygamy start becoming illegal?
- 📝 Why were the Scandinavians not as expansive as other Europeans in global colonization?
- 📝 Why didn't colonial empires exchange their colonies with others empire to make their territories whole?
- 📝 How widespread was practice of fusion of Graeco-Roman and barbarian names?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Is external expansion an element of fascist ideology
- 📝 Was Fascism tied to any Specific Ideology Before Nazism and Italy's Fascist Party?
- 📝 Why was Spanish Fascist dictatorship left in power after World War II?
- 📝 Did the Socialist and the Fascist party share the electoral programme in Italy?
- 📝 Was the Battle of Tours really the turning point for the Umayyad expansion into Europe?
- 📝 What was the argument for the Japanese pursuing the Northern Expansion Doctrine during WWII?
- 📝 What currently existing IT companies collaborated with Nazi Germany or Fascist Italy?
- 📝 How did Western leaders justify NATO's eastwards expansion after promising the Soviet leadership it won't happen?
- 📝 Was Roman expansion & casus belli as just as they claimed?
- 📝 Are Zoot suits considered an element of the 1940s Hipster subculture?
- 📝 Did Hitler get called a fascist by his opponents within Germany? Did he or other Nazis have a problem with that?
- 📝 Would Korea have divided, without the influence of external powers?
- 📝 How did the countries devolved from USSR turn from communism to democracy or other ideology peacefully after the collapse?
- 📝 Looking for the source of a quote on Nazi ideology
- 📝 Which people resisted Russian expansion most fiercely?
- 📝 Where can I learn about Jewish Zealot ideology and history?
- 📝 Was the Nazi ideology invented by Hitler?
- 📝 What were the main causal forces leading to rise of fascist movement and fascist government in Germany?
- 📝 Does the expansion of the U.S federal government after 1865 support the argument that U.S civil war itself was about states' rights?
- 📝 How did the accounting and capital organization system work in communist countries like the USSR? Did ideology justify or undermine the system?
- 📝 Has any ideology ever had an internal war?
- 📝 Why were the British Union of Fascist outfits so bad compared to the Nazis?
- 📝 Why did Hitler attack the Soviet Union when he was still busy fighting the United Kingdom?
- 📝 When did people decide that all caps means the writer is shouting?
- 📝 Did the ancients or other pre-industrial civilisations engage in unsustainable practices?
- 📝 Why was France granted an equal status among victors of World War II?
- 📝 Do historians agree that most wars are caused by religion?
- 📝 How do historians and linguists know how to pronounce the names from non-phonetic scripts?
- 📝 Why, in ancient battles, did being encircled mean defeat?
- 📝 Did China ever consider a phonetic writing system?
