Do all Christian views need to have a Biblical basis?
score:10
A good reference on the reformed, evangelical position on this is from chapter 1 of the Westminster Confession
We speak of the Bible as God's Word because in it he speaks to us (2 Tim 3:16). He speaks to us personally in the Bible through the Holy Spirit (1 Cor 2:12). Because the Bible is considered as God's Word it is his definitive words to us, the only infallible source of knowing him. It is also sufficient for everything we need to know about him. This means that in theory we don't need to look anywhere else to know God's will.
Some points to note:
The Bible won't tell us about absolutely everything that there is to know. It isn't particularly concerned about things like mathematics. The Bible is the final authority on matters of faith. Often it may not even answer your personal questions about God and his will. In this situation, either it means that we need further reflection, or that we're asking the wrong questions which means we may need to realign our concerns with the Bible's.
The Bible won't state everything down explicitly. Often our understanding of God is derived as a consequence of what we read in the Bible. E.g. the Bible doesn't mention the Trinity, but we can certainly see the ideas (e.g. John 17). This has implications on contemporary issues or things which we think the Bible doesn't deal with. We can draw principles and doctrines and apply them to different contexts. But you likely won't find specific answers to decisions in your own context such as whether you should do X or Y.
Not everything in the Bible is easy to understand. Often the difficulty in understanding lies in our own hardness against God, which is why God has given us the Holy Spirit to help us. Often it is because of the difficulty in understanding the actual meaning. The reformers also derived the principle that Scripture should interpret Scripture, which upholds the authority of the Bible while recognising its difficulties. Often the difficulty in understanding is not in individual statements but in the message as a whole and in the emphases. E.g. many parts of the Bible teaches us to love, but it is not the biggest teaching. The biggest teaching is that we need God's salvation because without it we cannot love anyway.
It's commonly recognised that there are at least 3 other sources: reason, tradition, experience. These are part of God's common grace to everyone. They can be helpful, but these should only be considered as secondary sources. They are ultimately flawed because people are flawed.
Reason. We use reason in deducing a lot of things, even reading the Bible. But we know that our capabilities to reason are limited, and people contradict themselves anyway. From a philosophical perspective, we can't know God by sheer reason. Our senses have limited scope, and by nature we deny God anyway (Rom 1:19f). God needs to reveal himself to us and tell us about himself and what he desires. E.g. he needs to tell us that there is only 1 of him. Anything else is just a guessing game. E.g. "I think God is like ..."
Experience. Can we know God from experiencing a vision? We don't particularly need it if the Bible is his revelation to us. A vision doesn't make us more anointed. Neither do we need such a vision or revelation to supplement the Bible since the Bible is sufficient. But if we do get such a vision, it should still be weighed up against Scripture (e.g. 1 Jn 4:1-3). Besides, the Holy Spirit is the important subjective, experience of God. I don't mean speaking in tongues, and it doesn't need to 'feel' particularly spiritual. The fact that we can repent and believe in Jesus is evidence of it already.
Tradition. Can an individual (such as the Pope) have more authority to give a special revelation from God? People may have particular gifts from God, e.g. Eph 4:11. The Apostles carried a unique authority because they were eyewitnesses to Jesus (Acts 1:21). But no one has a special phone line to God. All Christians have the same direct line to God, i.e. the Holy Spirit. Even the Apostles needed that before they could start preaching (Acts 2). Having said that, the teaching of church leaders, books or each other can be helpful. Even non-Christian teachings/writings can be helpful. But that's not to say that they're always right. Neither can they carry the same authority as the Bible, because they are ultimately man's words.
So we can have secondary sources to help us know God, but the ultimate authority is the Bible because of the special authority that the Bible carries as the Word of God. The implication is that everything else is either wrong or inadequate, which means that we do need to come back to the Bible in the end. And because of the difficulty of understanding the Bible sometimes, we need to continually be going back to Scripture. You may even be surprised by what you find.
Upvote:-3
Short answer: YES! Why? It's my biblical basis:
2Co 10:5 KJV
Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;
The bible is like a programming language that can compile itself! :)
Upvote:6
I was going to write a nuanced answer, but upon reflection, I think I'll come down firmly on the side of: No.
I realize many will disagree, but I'd like to offer several reasons for my view, as food for thought.
Not all churches that are commonly regarded as Christian believe that all Christian beliefs must have a biblical basis. Most Protestant churches do, but Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox give Tradition a strong role. Timothy Ware (aka Metropolitan Kallistos), in his book The Orthodox Church, gives the Bible the principal place within Holy Tradition.
The list of books of the New Testament was not definitively settled until the late fourth century. See, for instance, Development of the New Testament canon on Wikipedia. There were some books that weren't included until very late, while some books were included in early versions of the New Testament that no longer are. For instance, the 5th century Codex Alexandrinus (in the British Museum) contains 1 and 2 Clement, even though the canon was supposedly closed prior to that date. For a long time there wasn't a strict separation between "inspired" and "unspired" books.
Until the invention of the printing press, it wasn't possible for most Christians to possess a Bible. Until Gutenberg, making a copy of a book was a laborious process, potentially a work of months, done entirely by hand. In the past I was told tales of Bibles chained to pulpits in Catholic churches, lest the faithful find out what they really said. In fact, though, Bibles were chained to pulpits because they were so hard to create, and therefore were extremely expensive. Further, the faithful had a chance to hear Scripture at every service; all of the ancient churches had a lectionary, which prescribed readings of the Gospels, Epistles, and in some cases the Old Testament.
But this was a far cry from every man having his own Bible. If Christianity were dependent on that, it could not have come about until the fifteenth century.
Upvote:8
Clearly not all Christian views need to have a Biblical basis. I'm a Christian, and I have the view that the square of 2 is 4, and that Neil Armstrong walked on the moon, however these view are not explained in the Bible.
I think the closest Christians have to a principle similar to that about which you're asking, is the concept that all Christian views must be consistent with the Bible. And I believe that all Christian traditions can agree with this--to the extent that they believe the Bible can be accurately interpreted.
Catholics hold Tradition in high esteem, but (to my understanding), they believe that Tradition never conflicts with the Bible.
The LDS church has other scriptures they use, but again, these, at least in their view, never conflict with the Bible.
And in my examples, the Bible doesn't say anything about the square of 2 not being 4, nor that Neil Armstrong did not walk on the moon.
More post
- 📝 Does the Russian Orthodox Church recognize Adolf Hitler as a Saint?
- 📝 Catholic view of Biblical saints
- 📝 Is a historical Jesus historically necessary?
- 📝 Did the virgin Mary worship Jesus?
- 📝 God and Satan in the book of Job: how did they know about this conversation?
- 📝 Does the 5th Veritas Covid Whistleblower on Pfizer change the Catholic Church's position on the the morality of the Pfizer vaccine?
- 📝 When was the last time, if ever, the secular world acknowledged a demonic possession?
- 📝 Wouldn't the "spirit of Jesus" [mentioned in Acts 16:7] challenge the idea of the Trinity?
- 📝 If you are a cardinal, does that mean that you are an immediate successor to a dead or resigned pope?
- 📝 Is there any biblical support for the Church to allow governments to close churches and prevent public worship?
- 📝 Is there a Catholic list of Old Testament sacraments?
- 📝 Atheism is the default position. Isn't the burden of proof on the Christian to assert that God exists?
- 📝 Why did human lifespans drop after the Flood?
- 📝 Who populates the Millennium as mortals?
- 📝 Do any Christian traditions permit suicide to avoid being dishonored (raped)?
- 📝 What is the argument and Biblical basis that it is possible to know God from nature?
- 📝 Is there an ontological change in human nature after Jesus Passion and resurrection?
- 📝 How do Trinitarians explain the Athanasian Creed saying that the "one God" is the Trinity rather than the Father as in the Nicene Creed?
- 📝 What is an overview of resurrection events in the New Testament?
- 📝 Where can one access Aland's 23rd edition which was used for the first edition of the New American Standard Bible (NASB)?
- 📝 How does the New Apostolic Church compare to evangelical christians?
- 📝 What is an overview of Christian spiritual practices for cultivating and increasing love over time?
- 📝 Why did Jesus favor Peter, James and John more than the other disciples?
- 📝 Is BDSM dealt with in Scripture?
- 📝 What is an overview of the way Adam and Eve ate and became like God?
- 📝 Why is it common to refer to Jacob as Jacob, rather than calling him Israel?
- 📝 Old testament: where is Eternal Life and Judgement discussed?
- 📝 What is the basis for the position that only Paul's writings are applicable to the church today?
- 📝 Does the Catholic Church teach that we need to pray for Jesus?
- 📝 What Popes have resigned in the past?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Do all Christian views need to have a Biblical basis?
- 📝 What biblical (scriptural) basis does a Christian have to command the blessings?
- 📝 What is the Biblical and historical basis for Christian pacifism?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for the priesthood of all believers?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for testing the truthfulness of every statement made by Prophets or Apostles who have been confirmed as 'real'?
- 📝 Did George Muller have a Biblical basis for not accepting illegitimate orphans?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for the concept that demons have an odor?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for saying that we won't have a second chance to be saved after we die?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis used by Reformed theologians to argue that all those dying in infancy are saved?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for Christians NOT to quit their jobs, sell all their possessions, and preach the gospel?
- 📝 What Biblical basis do "separation traditions" have to support their beliefs?
- 📝 Do any non-Swedenborgian Christian denominations have a smaller biblical canon than Protestantism?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for Christian denominations to believe in a visible appearance of Christ Jesus when he returns?
- 📝 What are the predominant Christian views on whether Jesus had to specifically die by crucifixion? Could he have chosen another kind of death?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis that God's sacrifice is sufficient for all of our sins (past included)?
- 📝 What is the Catholic biblical or canon basis saying some moral works without grace (transient or permanent) are good (or not have the nature of sin)?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis that we no longer need to confess and repent?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for all people meeting God when they die?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for only keeping the weekly Sabbath while disregarding all the other feasts/holy convocations (Lev 23, Num 28, 29)?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for accepting Feminist Christian Theology which says we should use female pronouns for God?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for saying that Matthew 22:30 refers to all marriages ceasing at death?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for asserting that infants can have faith in Christ under a Calvinistic framework?
- 📝 Biblical basis or rationale for Christian Identity Movement?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for rejecting Feminist Christian Theology which says we should use female pronouns for God?
- 📝 Is there a consensus among Christian scholars or apologists as to which Biblical prophecies have been fulfilled?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for requiring someone to have faithful children to become an elder?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for All Saint's Day?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for the belief that people must have children?
- 📝 Which Christian denominations believe there is a biblical basis for hunting animals for sport?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for saying that Middle East Region will not have peace?
