Upvote:1
I think Saint Augustine has the opposite idea in The City of God.
From volume 1, book 2, chapter 8
But, some one will interpose, these are the fables of poets, not the deliverances of the gods themselves. Well, I have no mind to arbitrate between the lewdness of theatrical entertainments and of mystic rites; only this I say, and history bears me out in making the assertion, that those same entertainments, in which the fictions of poets are the main attraction, were not introduced in the festivals of the gods by the ignorant devotion of the Romans, but that the gods themselves gave the most urgent commands to this effect, and indeed extorted from the Romans these solemnities and celebrations in their honour. I touched on this in the preceding book, and mentioned that dramatic entertainments were first inaugurated at Rome on occasion of a pestilence, and by authority of the pontiff. And what man is there who is not more likely to adopt, for the regulation of his own life, the examples that are represented in plays which have a divine sanction, rather than the precepts written and promulgated with no more than human authority? If the poets gave a false representation of Jove in describing him as adulterous, then it were to be expected that the chaste gods should in anger avenge so wicked a fiction, in place of encouraging the games which circulated it. Of these plays, the most inoffensive are comedies and tragedies, that is to say, the dramas which poets write for the stage, and which, though they often handle impure subjects, yet do so without the filthiness of language which characterizes many other performances; and it is these dramas which boys are obliged by their seniors to read and learn as a part of what is called a liberal and gentlemanly education.
Here Augustine is railing against the gods of Rome, particularly Jove, as false gods. We know they are false precisely because they command and are pleased with that which is evil, and which represents them as evil. I don't think Augustine would be comfortable identifying our God with Saturn.
I'm sure there were some Christians who thought that Saturn and the God of Israel were the same being, but that would almost certainly be a minority view. It certainly isn't the Bishop of Hippo's view.
All of Volume 1 of The City of God here. He mentions Saturn quite a bit, too. Never favorably.