Were grapes luxurious food in Ancient Rome?

score:12

Accepted answer

Grapes were affordable for the common people.

The Edict of Diocletian on Maximum Prices from 301 CE lists 4 Roman pounds (~ 1.31 kg) of grapes for 4 denarii. The same price as 10 quinces or 30 big plums.

A farm labourer's wages were 25 denarii every workday; and a carpenter, 50. So most people could buy those 4 pounds of grapes without impacting their economy severely.

Upvote:6

No, grapes were grown and are very common in most Mediterranean countries. Wine, not beer, was the preferred drink of choice in the most parts of the Roman empire. Only where wine wasn't grown beer replaced it, in the northern parts of the empire and Egypt. The price of grapes in those areas would be higher due to transportation costs and fragility. Affordable for the rich, but not so much for the poor.

Poor people would drink less wine and of lower quality with more water (Romans usually didn't drink wine 'straight' but most of the time watered it down). For the very poor, grapes would be a luxury food, but an affordable luxury food.

It's EXTREMELY unlikely a Roman emperor would sit on his throne being fed grapes by a (scantily???) clad concubine. Compare this with king Charles III being fed grapes by queen Camilla on a throne. That's not a fair comparison, because Roman emperors in public were much more ceremonial. Even for the few truly deranged emperors that would be too much.

The color of the grapes has nothing to do with the value of the color purple. The color purple came from Tyrian Purple which was really expensive to make.

More post

Search Posts

Related post